SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (149869)11/27/2001 3:52:22 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 186894
 
Jim, <How hard would it be for Intel to add x86-64 instructions to the Itanium?>

I never thought of that. Can't be too hard, I suppose. The part of the Merced and McKinley processors that do x86 code is actually pretty small, and according to AMD, x86-64 only adds a small amount to the die size of Hammer.

Tenchusatsu



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (149869)11/27/2001 5:01:34 PM
From: Windsock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jimbo - Re:"How hard would it be for Intel to add x86-64 instructions to the Itanium?"

And what would be the purpose of that silly project, to make AMD happy?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News