SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (39136)11/27/2001 6:33:46 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
OK smarty pants. My kids have been telling me how teens dys each other. Is that short for disrespecting someone or for expressing a Dysphemism. I am hoping you will say its the latter because then I can do a Cliff Clayborn on them. I love to do Cliff almost as much as they hate it when I do.



To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (39136)11/27/2001 7:04:01 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
I believe that "Imaginary Friend" in the religious context isn't a euphemism at at.

I see your point, but I don't think so. The purpose of an euphemism is to express something in a relatively inoffensive way. If, for example, you were describing an ugly woman, you might say she is "plain." Fat women post personal adds that say "reubenesque." Neither term is a compliment. They are simply the nicest way to say it and still get the point across. You wouldn't say that an ugly woman was pretty or a fat woman buff. Those would be inaccurate. A euphemism isn't a lie, it's a softening. "Imaginary friend" is the softest way I could think of to express the idea. Would you prefer superstitious? I thought that harsher, which is why I used what I used, but I'm open to alternatives.

Karen