Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorne who wrote (11083)	11/27/2001 11:34:27 PM
From: joseph krinsky	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27666

Arab League Warns Against Attacking Iraq Tuesday November 27 5:04 PM ET CAIRO (Reuters) - The head of the 22-member Arab League said on Tuesday that Arabs would not stand for any attack on Iraq as an extension of the U.S. ``war on terrorism'' and said such a move would destroy the present global coalition. Amr Moussa, secretary-general of the inter-government body and a former Egyptian foreign minister, was speaking a day after President Bush (news - web sites) demanded Baghdad let international arms inspections resume or face unspecified consequences. ``We do not accept striking Iraq or any other Arab country,'' Moussa said in remarks carried on the Web site of Egypt's official MENA news agency and monitored by the BBC. ``Launching military action against any Arab state would spell the end of consensus in the international alliance against terrorism.'' He said that this Arab position would not be changed by Bush's comments. The U.S. president did not specify what consequences Iraq might face but said President Saddam Hussein (news - web sites), long an avowed enemy of Washington, would ``find out.'' Arab leaders have repeatedly said they oppose expanding the U.S. campaign, which has focused on removing the Taliban Islamic militia from power in Afghanistan (news - web sites), to include any Arab state. There have been concerns in the region that Washington might launch strikes against Arab countries such as Sudan, Libya, Iraq and Syria, which Washington includes on an official list of states it believes sponsor terrorism. dailynews.yahoo.com _____________________ The first bomb we drop should be on the building that they hold their meetings in, IMO. A double daisey cutter with cherries on top would do just fine.

To: lorne who wrote (11083)	11/27/2001 11:35:55 PM
From: dvdw©	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27666

Are any of you wondering, why we have not heard of a single g4 Hospital contingent on the side of bin laden. When he commits men to battle it is his responsibility to assemble support services to deal with needs of a battlefield. Like Hospitals, medics, etc.... But no, we see none, because there are none.Terrorists like these, view average citizens as fodder. The zealots taking up arms are reducible to two groups, dumb and dumber. bin laden is one of histories radar screen blips who empowers hisself through a stream of delusion over a long period of time. Think about it. What would his organization do if it did rule the world? Did anyone else see the TALIBAN special on MSNBC where the Pakistani Mullah who ran the school endorsed the Taliban,and their methods, and subsequently projected a Taliban type government for the rest of the world. What the hell are these nuts thinking? The United States needs to prosecute this war until these extremists who would have us all cow towing and wearing berkas, are gone. This is one of the few times where my tax dollars and yours are being well spent. God help us if our military is not able to stop these fools.