SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tcmay who wrote (150037)11/28/2001 11:45:43 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
"Most radical technologies will never make it out of the lab."

Yes. But it is not because those other ideas are
incredibly stupid, as the other part of your post seems
to imply (by "ha!" remarks). Because of limited world-wide
resources, the technologies for mass production
are selected by biased and partially-informed
individuals. This does not prove much about viability
of other technologies, this is just a misfortune.

However, there are negative examples too:
e.g. Intel and Rambus technology.

"It's naive to think Intel was asleep."
In this case we should conclude that Intel was
intentionally misleading the public by multiplicity
of official negative statements about SOI technology,
right?

- Ali



To: tcmay who wrote (150037)11/28/2001 3:56:56 PM
From: milo_morai  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tim, it's very simple to understand why point as I based my comments on what Intel and IBM have been claiming for the last 6 months.

You better go back and re-read INTC's statements.

Bottom Line is Intel was lying.

M.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News