Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (39263)	11/28/2001 7:49:54 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Your implication otherwise is unwarranted and unwelcome. Are you angry with me for some reason? Karen

To: jlallen who wrote (39263)	12/13/2001 10:35:24 PM
From: E	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 82486

I am always in the mood for discussion. Your implication otherwise is unwarranted and unwelcome. JLA I've been too busy to drop by and laugh at you. But I bookmarked a couple of your more risible false advertisements for yourself, and I think I'll take the time this evening to point out that you oughta be sued for false advertising--aren't you lucky that I'm not the lawsuit-happy, money-grubbing Christian minister, Mr. Litigious, Poet-"stalking" (cyber! and imo! naturally!) CH!! "Always in the mood for discussion?" Well, shure, if the discussion is defined in some way private to you, as in "Discussion-in-which-my-dull-witted fellow-posters-on-the-Call-Your-Fellow-Citizens-Traitors-(Just Kidding!) thread don't make fools of their vacuous selves," shure, then you're in the mood for it, you mean. You guys were SUCH a grouping of a*holes in that argument with me that you couldn't stand it, and "I'm always in the mood for discussion" got that special* JLA meaning of "always," meaning "not always, but only when it's going my way," so you... banned me to stop your discomfiture. You silly slogan-brained twit, you! You and your goofy pals were SO relieved to have me gone you didn't have the good manners not to keep bashing me (contentlessly, as usual) after I could no longer reply. Here's another one of your hypocritical jokes: The best people, IMO, are the ones who don't leave SI when their ideas are questioned.....JLA It's amusing that you think it's fine to block someone for questioning your ideas (yet to keep badmouthing them after you don't allow them to answer), yet you criticize someone for leaving SI, pretending (hypocritically and lyingly) that they have done it because "their ideas are questioned" --- when that has never happened. I know of people who have left because they got tired of being called traitors, likened to Hitler, being falsely accused of criticizing our young men overseas, being the recipient of unwelcome semi-obsessional effectual harassment, having sexual or personal innuendo posted about them, and being professionally trashed by those who know nothing of them professionally... but because "their ideas are questioned"? Never, liar. Cite an example. I love asking people like you and CH to cite posts substantiating your lies because you never can. Because you make stuff up, reality not being flattering to you. It's been fun not hanging out on SI, I must do more of it! (Though in truth, this has been fun, too.) C'mon, give me a JLA one-liner, you lame, negligible, cowardly, hypocrite. Two Entries for the Joke Thread: siliconinvestor.com Hhttp://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=16713634

To: jlallen who wrote (39263)	12/13/2001 10:43:18 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

If I get some clear time next year maybe i'll start a thread and have fun banning you and your intellectually reprehensible albeit lame friends and not letting any of you answer. Your answers are always so lame, it won't be much of a loss to you, actually. Its purpose could be to dissect your (and their) logic and accurately characterize your posts. What a fun idea! Try in the meantime to be a man instead of a mouse. Scared of discussion with me, so you protect yourself with a ban. Not scared, protected by the ban, of hurling unsubstantiated insults free from being asked for any substantiation by the one you've gagged. My characterizations would most certainly be substantiated! neener neener neener. I think I'll save a link to this post on my desktop to remind me next time you irritate me with your cowardly attacks against those who can't reply followed by ludicrous bragging about how much you like discussion. Say what you want, I'm too busy right now to reply, but when i'm not, i look forward to the deep content I know will be forthcoming. Does "LOL" ring a bell?