SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (150050)11/28/2001 11:14:42 AM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Combjelly, Re: "Now you may claim that people are willing to pay more for a less reliable and lower spec'd product because it has Intel's name on it"

I think it's time you moved past your naive comparison here. With flash, there isn't a "best" technology, yet. Different technologies offer different advantages, and all have their own set of disadvantages - that's why you sell different flash to different products. I'm sure AMD will do well once they improve their production lines, but you shouldn't believe that AMD's Mirror-bit flash is all it's cracked up to be until you see their product.

wbmw



To: combjelly who wrote (150050)11/28/2001 1:50:33 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Re: ". The question is how profitable will Intel's flash be when AMD can price their product at the same, or even lower level as Intel's, and have better specifications? "

You keep speculating about future developments that may never occur.

Face it - Intel is the preeminent supplier of Flash memory - and they are doing much better than AMD.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News