SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin McKenzie who wrote (8706)11/28/2001 12:37:02 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99280
 
Worst than that, they did it "off the book" in partnerships where Enron was the limited partner (and put the money up) and Fastow was the general partner. A very flagrant breach of fiduciary responsibilities. But frankly, I have seen the equivalent of this breach often. Read in 10Q's the "internal deals", where, for instance the CEO borrows from the company a big chunk of money, then he buys with it a piece of real estate which is leased back to company, a lease structured, quite often, to pay back the loan in three to five years. I'll take a deal like that anytime, but not as a officer of the company, that is a clear (although, in these parts, legal) breach of fiduciary responsibilities.

Zeev



To: Kevin McKenzie who wrote (8706)11/28/2001 1:17:49 PM
From: NOW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Amazingly, NPR did a story two weeks ago or so in which the analyst interviewed said something to the effect of " Enron is the true 21 st C. company. their capital is intellectual capital. they are a model"
I kid you not!
and strangely enough, I think what he said was absolutely true!!!g/ng