SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (1202)11/28/2001 2:06:21 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15516
 
Those articles are very interesting.

While I was reading them a light went off in my head ( this may be dangerous)LOL.

First of all.........why were these gov't contracts for SDI given to foreign companies? It was mentioned in one of the articles that Reagan awarded them to Britian in exchange for support of another of his pet programs.

Here is an article by Arianna Huffington which describes her feelings toward the Bush proposed tax cut.

Operation Enduring Avarice
Filed October 31, 2001
According to our leaders, we are not supposed to let the war on terror disrupt our normal lives. And, to their credit, they're leading by example.

For instance, far from the war disrupting the House's normal run of shameless corporate toadying, it's enhancing it. Indeed, it's giving our leaders cover to put forward their answer to each and every problem America faces: a massive corporate giveaway. And they even have the gall to call it patriotism. Others, using the English language more rigorously, call it war profiteering.

The so-called economic stimulus package that passed the House last week would have been scurrilous in times of prosperity. But in this time of national crisis it is, quite simply, grotesque.

The grisly details include a retroactive elimination of the corporate alternative minimum tax and a 10 percent cut in the capital gains tax. And on the other side of the Capitol, the Senate Republicans are proposing an acceleration of all the top-bracket tax cuts and a return of that old favorite, the fully tax-deductible three-martini lunch.

The House package is little more than a rehashed corporate wish list, doling out $115 billion in tax breaks to big business and the wealthiest taxpayers, and a comparatively measly $14 billion to poor and moderate-income families in the form of tax rebates and unemployment benefits. And while the tax cuts for the haves are permanent, those for the have-nots are good for only one year.

What's more, the money given to corporate America is given without conditions -- not tax credits tied to investments, but handouts more likely to end up in CEOs' Christmas bonuses than back in the economy.

All you really need to know about the true nature of this bill can be found in a largely unnoticed provision that makes permanent a gaping tax loophole that was about to expire. It allows multinational corporations such as GE and Ford to avoid paying taxes by shifting profits to their offshore subsidiaries -- but only if those profits remain overseas. Tell me, how exactly is providing incentives to keep money out of our economy supposed to stimulate our economy?

The House bill is so outrageous that even some top GOP officials are balking. In a rare slip from the party line, Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill colorfully criticized it as "show business." Rep. Greg Ganske, R-Iowa, one of seven Republicans who voted against the bill, labeled it "an early Christmas card" for "already profitable corporations." And the president's budget director, Mitch Daniels, informed the nation in a poetic outburst that "the corral gates" have been blown open and "the animals are running loose."

The galloping beasts in this case are corporate lobbyists and their chums on the Hill, Dick Armey and Tom DeLay chief among them.

The juiciest goodie in this box of corporate bon-bons, the retroactive repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax, will lead to $25 billion in instant corporate rebate checks to needy companies such as IBM (slated to get $1.4 billion), GM ($833 million) and GE ($671 million).

Of the $25 billion refund, over $6.3 billion will be given to just 14 corporations. Not surprisingly, these 14 lucky winners have been regular and generous political donors. Over the last 10 years, they've poured almost $15 million in soft money into the national committees of both parties. It turns out that may be the smartest investment they've ever made.

Such a blatant quid pro quo is so indefensible that the main champions of the grandly named Economic Security and Recovery Act aren't even trying very hard to justify it. Take Armey's wan effort on "Meet the Press." There he was, half-heartedly trying to convince Tim Russert that we need these massive tax cuts because the last round of massive tax cuts were not geared to stimulating the economy. Really? Wasn't that him at a House subcommittee hearing back in March, selling the last tax cut bill as "just the shot in the arm that this economy needs"?

Armey then offered us all a lecture on how big corporate giveaways are the best way to create new jobs. Unfortunately, the facts don't bear him out. The $15 billion Congress just handed the airline industry hasn't kept it from laying off 140,000 workers.

Armey also called enhanced unemployment benefits "a feeble response" and not "commensurate with the American spirit." He went on to promise that the new stimulus package "will create 170,000 new jobs next year alone." Not exactly the most heartening news to the 7.8 million people currently unemployed in the country. What are the 7.63 million left on the sidelines supposed to do, sit around and cross their fingers, hoping one or two of the lucky 170,000 will eventually rub their new bosses the wrong way? Is that more in keeping with the American spirit?

It's time to declare war on war profiteering. But we'll need political leaders able to dramatize the betrayal of the public trust this bill represents.

Maybe there are too many numbers with too many zeros to draw the public's attention away from the latest "general alert" issued by the attorney general. So let's forget the numbers and focus on the moving story of good overcoming evil. Let history record that, after Sept. 11, our leaders brought the nation together and decided to fight the war on terrorism by making business lunches fully tax-deductible and levying no taxes on corporate profits patriotically funneled off shore. Call it Operation Enduring Avarice.

It's enough to put a lump in your throat.

ariannaonline.com



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (1202)11/28/2001 5:48:40 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15516
 
I worry about the Harvard scientist who disappeared recently. Yesterday, there was a large
article in the paper. If he had been depressed, his family, his colleagues or his friends would
have detected the problem.

He was a specialist in ebola. In a case like his, I don't have a great deal of confidence in the
local police. His rental car was found near a bridge in Tennessee I believe. The police will
do as little as possible unless his family can bring a great deal of pressure on them.



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (1202)11/28/2001 5:50:32 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Man's Death Not Related to Anthrax, Governor Says
The New York Times

November 28, 2001

CONNECTICUT

By PAUL ZIELBAUER

ARTFORD, Nov. 27 — Gov. John G.
Rowland, seeking to calm nerves already
frayed by the anthrax death of Ottilie W. Lundgren
of Oxford, Conn., today defused one rumor that
had emerged from the government's investigation
into her case and shed some light on other aspects
of the continuing inquiry.

Mr. Rowland announced that the unexplained death
of an 84-year-old man from Seymour, Conn.,
adjacent to Oxford, who died several weeks ago,
was not attributable to anthrax, as had been briefly
feared. The man's death had caught the eyes of
state health officials who have been reviewing
recent deaths in the state because he had died alone
and the exact cause of death was unknown.

Mr. Rowland also announced that investigators were tracking down reports that
anthrax cultures may have been stored at the University of Connecticut's Storrs
campus. A professor in the animal science department said that anthrax is not kept
in any campus facility.

But if Mr. Rowland helped clarify some things, he was forced to acknowledge that
none of what so far has been learned since Mrs. Lundgren, 94, died of inhalation
anthrax one week ago has helped explain how she contracted the disease.

And indeed, one more possible explanation seemed to be struck down today as Mr.
Rowland revealed that initial test results for anthrax were negative at a home in
Seymour that received mail that might have crossed paths with an anthrax-tainted
letter sent to United States Senator Patrick J. Leahy's office in Washington last
month. Further tests inside the house are planned.

The mail to that specific home came under scrutiny, Mr. Rowland explained, after
the United States Postal Service and the F.B.I., using "very sophisticated
technological capabilities," were able to trace all the mail delivered to the Oxford
area that had passed through the Hamilton, N.J., processing center that had handled
the tainted letter sent to Senator Leahy's office last month.

Since Mrs. Lundgren's illness became public last week, state and federal health
officials have reviewed medical records of 15 people whose illnesses resembled
early signs of anthrax, the State Department of Public Health said in a release today.
Tests on 11 of those people were negative; tests on the remaining 4 were not yet
available, the agency said.

Mr. Rowland said the state and federal agencies investigating Mrs. Lundgren's death
had received 400 to 500 calls of suspected anthrax, none of which had been
verified. He added, however, "There are some leads the F.B.I. are following up on."

At the University of Connecticut's campus in Storrs, more than 70 miles from
Oxford, state health officials were investigating a tip given to the state police that the
university's patho-biology building harbored anthrax cultures that dated back to the
1960's. Mr. Rowland said whether the tip was accurate, or whether finding anthrax
spores there was useful to the search for the spores that killed Mrs. Lundgren, was
unclear.

nytimes.com



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (1202)11/28/2001 5:53:15 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Genome Offers 'Fingerprint' for Anthrax
The New York Times

November 28, 2001

IN THE LABORATORY

By WILLIAM J. BROAD

cientists have decoded the genome of the
anthrax bacterium and are sharing their
findings with law enforcement officials eager for
clues about who is using the lethal microbe as a
deadly weapon.

The advance, experts said, might speed a frustrating
criminal investigation into a scare that has sickened
a dozen people and killed five others. Ultimately,
they added, the advance also promises to aid
diagnosis and treatment of the disease, which can
be fatal if untreated.

The scientists are based at the Institute for Genomic
Research, a private, nonprofit center in Rockville,
Md., that has pioneered the decoding of genomes,
the complete set of genetic material that serves as
instruction books of life. In interviews, these
scientists discussed the work reluctantly after a
federal official divulged the completion of the
genome.

Public disclosure of the research, they said, is being delayed so law enforcement
officials can examine the findings.

The geneticists said they had recently completed decoding two anthrax microbes.
Both are the Ames strain, which federal officials have identified as the particularly
virulent type of anthrax used in the recent attacks.

One microbe was the Ames strain that served as a standard laboratory reference
sample; the other came from the Florida attacks that began the recent terror wave.

Dr. Claire M. Fraser, director of the Institute for Genomic Research, who with
Timothy Read led the deciphering team, said she and her colleagues are now
comparing the two samples for differences, which federal investigators could use to
look for genetic clues to their origin.

"It's not inconceivable," Dr. Fraser said, "that at some point we could make an
association between a molecular fingerprint" and the source of the anthrax weapon.

The work was financed by the National Science Foundation, a federal agency, and
its completion has raised a debate over whether the genome should be published.

"We were encouraged to release it," Dr. Fraser said. "But I'm uncomfortable until
we let" the Federal Bureau of Investigation and its science teams review the work.
"There's nothing to hide," she said, "but I want everybody to feel we're acting
responsibly."

She said the institute expected to make its findings public within a month, but if the
F.B.I. asked for the research to remain secret, she added, "we'd have to consider
that."

Dr. David R. Franz, former commander of the Army's germ-defense laboratory at
Fort Detrick, Md., and now vice president for chemical and biological defense at
the Southern Research Institute, an arm of the University of Alabama, said the
advance was potentially important.

"It may help the investigation," he said, perhaps by narrowing the pool of suspects.
But he cautioned that genetic information alone would be insufficient to track down
and identify the killer. "It's not going to be a smoking gun," Dr. Franz said.

Dr. Kathryn E. Beauregard, an anthrax expert at Emory University who recently
wrote about preliminary anthrax sequencing work for the American Association for
the Advancement of Science, said its completion "is really going to be helpful for
diagnostics and forensics."

Previously, scientists had decoded a portion of the anthrax genome. In that portion
they identified eight areas where the genetic material repeated in distinctive patterns.
Those eight areas currently serve as a "fingerprint" for the strain. Comparing the
eight regions in the Ames strain and eight regions in the samples obtained from the
cases in the anthrax outbreak has been one way the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention has been able to say the strains are indistinguishable.

Identification of a larger number of distinctive regions in the entire genome
presumably would allow scientists to make more detailed fingerprints and thus more
accurate comparisons. They might be able to build a library of fingerprints that
would let them detect subtle differences in the Ames strains that have been sent to
laboratories around the world, and thus trace the perpetrator.

"We are hoping to provide very valuable information," said Dr. Steven Salzburg, a
member of the team that is analyzing the genomes, "but I don't want to say what
right now."

Several scientists said the advance, and the possibility of new clues emerging, made
even less comprehensible the destruction of anthrax samples at Iowa State
University, where the Ames strain originally arose. Shortly after the first anthrax case
appeared last month, the F.B.I. said it had no objections to the university destroying
spores it had collected over more than seven decades and kept in more than 100
vials.

Experts said the reluctance to publish the anthrax genome casts light on a quiet
debate among government officials, ethicists and scientists over whether the nation's
biologists should be regulated, or regulate themselves, to restrict access to
information and materials that might have use in law enforcement or biological
weapons.

In a recent article in the journal Nature Genetics, Dr. Fraser, writing with Dr.
Malcolm R. Dando of the University of Bradford in Britain, said that if scientists
were not cautious, "the events of 11 Sept. could be repeated on an even larger scale
through the misuse of the science and technology we generate for peaceful
purposes."

The Institute for Genomic Research was founded in 1992 by J. Craig Venter, now
president of Celera Genomics in Rockville, Md., and Dr. Fraser's husband. It has
sequenced some two dozen microbes, including those that cause cholera,
tuberculosis and Lyme disease.

The institute often makes its sequences public on its Web site, www.tigr.org. The
anthrax case appears to be the first time a sequence's disclosure has been delayed
for law-enforcement reasons.

For weeks, beginning soon after the first anthrax attacks, federal scientists
scrambled to find genetic clues that might help them track the weapon's provenance.

"There's nothing," one scientist said. "It's frustrating. We grind it out, look for
variability. We've gone back to isolates," or samples of the various strains from the
field.

The advance promises to deepen the analysis, teasing out subtle differences among
Ames samples.

Dr. Martin E. Hugh-Jones, an anthrax expert at Louisiana State University who is
aiding the federal investigation, said such analyses had already revealed that the
Sterne strain, a weakened form of anthrax used to make some vaccines, is really
composed of three or four types that are readily identifiable and distinguishable.

If the same turns out to be true of Ames, Dr. Hugh-Jones said, then the F.B.I. could
go around to the two dozen or so labs in North America that are suspected of
having the microbe, subpoena samples and see if any match the murder weapon.

"You'd find out whose was closest," Dr. Hugh-Jones said. Investigators, he added,
would then examine the "chain of custody" to see if any suspicious individuals had
access to the deadly pathogen.

nytimes.com



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (1202)11/29/2001 1:46:09 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
"The Thatcher government's PR problem is that the scandal centers around Marconi Company Ltd., Britain's largest
electronics-defense contractor. Seven Marconi scientists are among the dead.

Marconi, which employs 50,000 workers worldwide, is a subsidiary of Britain's General Electric Company (GEC). GEC managing director Lord Wienstock recently launched his own internal investigation.

Yet, the GEC and the Ministry of Defense still contend that the 22 deaths are coincidental. A Ministry of Defense spokesman claims to have found "no evidence of any sinister links between them."

However, an article in the British publication THE INDEPENDENT claims the incidence of suicide among Marconi scientists is twice the national average of mentally healthy individuals. Either Marconi is hiring abnormally unstable scientists or something is very wrong.

Two deaths brought the issue to light in the fall of 1986. Within weeks of each other, two London-based Marconi scientists were found dead 100 miles away, in Bristol. Both were involved in creating the software for a huge, computerized Star Wars simulator, the hub of Marconi's SDI program. Both had been working on the simulator just hours before their death. Like the others, neither had any apparent reason to kill himself.

Vimal Dajibhai was a 24-year-old electronics graduate who worked at Marconi Underwater Systems in Croxley Green. In August 1986 his crumpled body was found lying on the pavement 240 feet below the Clifton Suspension Bridge in Bristol.

An inquest was unable to determine whether Dajibhai had been pushed off the bridge or whether he had jumped. There had been no witnesses. The verdict was left open. Yet, authorities did their best to pin his death on suicide.

Police testified that Dajibhai had been suffering from depression, something his family and friends flatly denied. Dajibhai had absolutely no history of personal or emotional problems.

Police also claimed that the deceased had been drinking with a friend, Heyat Shah, shortly before his death, and that a bottle of wine and two used paper cups had been found in his car. Yet, forensic tests were never done on the auto, and those who knew Vimal, including Shah, say that he had never taken a drink of alcohol in his life.

Investigating journalists found discrepancies in other evidence. "A police report noted a puncture mark on Dijabhai's left buttock after his fall from the bridge," explains Tony Collins, who covered the story for Britain's COMPUTER NEWS magazine. "Apparently, this was the reason his funeral was halted seconds before the cremation was to take place.

"Members of the Family were told that the body was to be taken away for a second postmortem, to be done by a top home- office pathologist. That's not normal. Then, a few months later, police held a press conference and announced that it hadn't been a puncture mark after all, that it was a wound caused by a bone fragment.

"I find it very difficult to reconcile the initial coroner's report with what the police were saying a few months later," Collins contends.

Officials didn't fare any better with the second Bristol fatality. Police virtually tripped over themselves to come up with a motive for the apparent--and unusually violent--suicide of Ashaad Sharif.

Sharif was a 26-year-old computer analyst who worked at the Marconi Defense Systems headquarters in Stanmore, Middlesex. On October 28, 1986, he allegedly drove to a public park not far from where Dajibhai had died. He tied one end of a nylon cord around a tree and tied the other end around his neck. Then he got back into his Audi 80 automatic, stepped on the gas and sped off, decapitating himself.

Marconi initially claimed Sharif was only a junior employee, and that he had nothing to do with Star Wars. Co-workers stated otherwise. At the time of his death, Sharif was apparently about to be promoted. Also, Ashaad reportedly worked for a time in Vimal Dajibhai's section.

The inquest determined that Sharif's death was a suicide. Investigating officers maintained that the man had killed himself because he'd been jilted by an alleged lover. Ashaad hadn't seen the woman in three years.

"Sharif was said to have been depressed over a broken romance," Tony Collins explains. "But the woman police unofficially say was his lover contends that she was only his landlady when he was working for British Aerospace in Bristol. She's married, has three children, and she's deeply religious. The possibility of the two having an affair seems highly unlikely--especially since Sharif had a fiancee in Pakistan. His family told me that he was genuinely in love with her."

Police suddenly switched stories. They began to say that Sharif had been deeply in love with the woman he was engaged to,and that he'd decapitated himself because another woman was pressuring him to call off the marriage.

Authorities claimed to have found a taped message in Sharif's car "tantamount" to a suicide note. On it, officers said, he'd admitted to having had an affair, thus bringing shame on his family. Family members who've heard the tape say that it actually gave no indication of why Sharif might want to kill himself.

Sharif's family was told by the coroner that it was "not in their best interest" to attend the inquest.

"It's been almost impossible to get to information about deaths that should be in the public domain," Tony Collins laments. "I've been given false names or incorrect spellings, or I've not been told where inquests have taken place. It's made it very difficult for me to try to track down the details of these cases."

In the Sharif case, two facts stand out: Ashaad had no history of depression, and there was absolutely no reason for him to be in Bristol.

A widely help theory among the establishment press is that the mysterious deaths are stress-related accidents or suicides. Such theories may not be far off the mark.

According to a high-ranking British government official, for the past year and a half the Ministry of Defense has been secretly investigating Marconi on allegations of defense- contract fraud--overcharging the government, bribing officials. The extensive probe has required most of the MoD's investiga- tive resources, conceivably reaching as far as Marconi's sub- contractors and into MoD research facilities such as the Royal Military College of Science and the Royal Air Force Research Center.

Almost all of the dead scientists were associated with one or more of these establishments.

If Marconi employees were being forced by management to perform or to cover up illegal activities, it may be that the stress did indeed get to them.

"In America, there are considerable incentives for people to blow the whistle if they're being asked to perform illegal acts like ripping off the government," a confidential source in Parliament explains. "However, in this country there have been perhaps 20 people who've blown the whistle, and none of them have ever worked again. They didn't receive any compensation. Here, you don't get any recognition. You get threatened with prosecution under the Official Secrets Act. They can fire you. Then they can take away your home and get you blacklisted.

"It's an impossible position to be placed in," the source adds. "It's quite conceivable that these people could have killed themselves because they felt terribly ashamed of what they'd done. For that matter, some of the accidents or suicides could have been men who'd taken bribes but who couldn't face the embarrassment of public disclosure."

If Marconi was systematically defrauding the government for millions of pounds each year, perhaps an employee stumbled upon incriminating evidence and had to be done away with. It would be easy enough to make it look like an accident.

Consider the peculiar death of Peter Peapell, found dead beneath his car in the garage of his Oxfordshire home. Peapell, 46, worked for the Royal Military College of Science, a world authority on communications technology, electronics surveillance and target detection. Peapell was an expert at using computers to process signals emitted by metals. His work reportedly included testing titanium for its resistance to explosives.

On the night of February 22, 1987, Peapell spent an enjoyable evening out with his wife, Maureen, and their friends. When they returned home, Maureen went straight to bed, leaving Peter to put the car away.

When Maureen woke up the next morning, she discovered that Peter had not come to bed. She went looking for him. When she reached the garage, she noticed that the door was closed. Yet she could hear the car's engine running.

She found her husband lying on his back beneath the car, his mouth directly below the tail pipe. She pulled him into the open air, but he was already dead.

Initially, Maureen thought her husband's death an accident. She presumed he'd gotten under the car to investigate a knocking he'd heard driving home the night before, and that he'd gotten stuck. But the light fixture in the garage was broken, and Peter hadn't been carrying a flashlight.

Police had their own suspicions. A constable the same height and wieght as Peter Peapell found it impossible to crawl under the car when the garage door was closed. He also found it impossible to close the door once he was under the car.

Carbon deposits from the inside of the garage door showed that the engine had been running only a short time. Yet, Mrs. Peapell had found the body almost seven hours after she'd gone to bed.

The coroner's inquest could not determine whether the death was a homicide, a suicide or an accident. According to Maureen Peapell, Peter had no reason to kill himself. They had no marital or financial problems. Peter loved his job. He'd just received a sizable raise, and according to colleagues, he'd exhibited "absolutely no signs of stress."

We may never know what is killing these scientists. Everyone has a theory."

The above is an excerpt from: fiu.edu
.......................................................*********************..................................................

Karen, the story is scary. As the story noted in the US people get a reward for turning in company crooks.