SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: milo_morai who wrote (64545)11/29/2001 9:44:55 AM
From: jcholewaRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
> Athlon isn't designed with a dual channel interface in mind

That's a stupid statement. What the author means is "Athlon is limited to a 2.13GB/s connection to the chipset". Saying that it's somehow not friendly to dual channel is stupid. A dual channel PC133 board would be *much* faster than a single channel PC133 board on an Athlon.



To: milo_morai who wrote (64545)11/29/2001 11:44:15 AM
From: Ali ChenRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
"The chart on the right proves the potential of the platform. Guess you were focusing on the Left chart."

I am focusing on performance numbers. Being 4x below
the "true" potential of 8000, 1500 or 2000 in UMA
is of no relevance.

Actually, the Sandra 912MB/s memory result is not
bad, it is only 15% below the theoretical 1050MB/s
FSB limit.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News