SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fingolfen who wrote (150317)11/29/2001 11:52:08 AM
From: wanna_bmw  Respond to of 186894
 
Fingolfen, Re: "If they're trying to push gate CD's below 65nm, I can guarantee that they're going to have trouble..."

Good point. Now that AMD knows that Intel will have 65nm gates at .13u, they are no doubt trying to do one better. With 70nm gates on their .18u process, doing the same at .13u would make a very sorry looking TBred. They are no doubt trying to shrink it to 65nm or 60nm. I'm not sure how much farther they can go, but maybe it's taking them a while to reduce defect levels.

wbmw



To: fingolfen who wrote (150317)11/29/2001 11:52:35 AM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 186894
 
Was there any mention of whether or not this was the bulk or SOI process??? I'd presume bulk, but I could be wrong.

I posted the entire article. My guess is this is not the SOI process BWDIK?

EP



To: fingolfen who wrote (150317)11/29/2001 12:54:11 PM
From: AK2004  Respond to of 186894
 
fingolfen
I just posted the article on amd thread but not much more details than in Elmer's summary
Regards
-Albert


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News