Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (150423)	11/29/2001 6:14:05 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Respond to of 186894

Ali, Re: "Didn't you furiously attack people on the other thread aggressively questioning the sole existence of 1/4 clocked areas?" Therein lies your confusion. I have never claimed that a "slow" clock doesn't exist in the Pentium 4. Rather, I "attacked" Kapkan because he was repeatedly claiming that this slow clock specifically applied to the decoder and other logic - without showing proof when asked. Therefore, I pose you the same question: Do you plan to continue this nonsense about the Pentium 4 "slow" clock running the majority of the chip, or will you take the quote at face value when it says, and I quote: "Most other parts of the chip run at half of the 3GHz fast clock since this makes these parts much easier to design. A few sections of the chip run at a quarter of this fast-clock frequency making them also easier to design." Try to keep your story straight, and please make an effort not to put words in my mouth that I never said. wbmw