Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (150438)	11/29/2001 6:42:11 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

I'm not trying to incite any class action suits, I just know Lawyers. A Lawyer would take a class action suit against Intel and/or a boxmaker based on P4+RDRAM vs P4+SDRAM as being misleading. Jim

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (150438)	11/29/2001 8:59:58 PM
From: f.simons	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: Jim, you're an observant guy, and I tend to read your posts more carefully than you think. But what do you think happens to people's opinions when they see you posting more Intel FUD and garbage on the other thread? Posts about lawsuits and hoping that Intel gets a Class Action suit on their P4+SDRAM systems, etc. It still looks like you are a recovering AMDroid, rather than someone whose epiphany has recently allowed them to consider Intel as an investment. Wanna- Jim's posts on the two threads have often had very different flavors. When Intel is rolling, he is in the stock (he says on the Intel thread), but even then cannot quite bring himself to say anything good about Intel on the AMD thread. Paul noticed this strange behavior years ago. Frank