SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: advocatedevil who wrote (56571)11/29/2001 6:59:05 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
AD,
Correct me if i am wrong, nvls delayed recovery by a quarter. This has happened before. I believed them before. I will not stop believing them now when the turn is imminent. That would be foolish to do. Thoughts! mike@very_foolish.com



To: advocatedevil who wrote (56571)11/29/2001 7:09:17 PM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 70976
 
AD, you're a veritable shorting machine.<bG> I've been wondering why you don't day trade with the trend? BTW, bought some more AMAT ah at $39.85

Gottfried



To: advocatedevil who wrote (56571)11/29/2001 7:48:00 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
ST trading:

re: 1000 shares short at $40.15
1000 shares cover at $40.15
break-even +$0

You don't pay commissions?

And, while we're nit-picking, a completely honest comparison of your (and mine this year) ST trading methods, vs. LTB&H, should take into account the fact that ST trading maximizes taxes. Your "take-home" is less than the numbers your showing.

JS@quibbling.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News