SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: craig crawford who wrote (135298)11/30/2001 12:44:34 AM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
So now you think that people who send hoax anthrax letters can be justified depending the intended recipients??? Let me guess, the senders of these letters are neither terrorists nor traitors, but the the doctors and nurses are more of your "traitors".



To: craig crawford who wrote (135298)11/30/2001 7:11:37 AM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Actually, not all of them performed abortions, but at least now we know you think such acts of terror in furtherance of political views are acceptable. Would it be equally acceptable to send actual anthrax to women's health clinics? Only if they perform abortions or would providing birth control to high school girls qualify them for your list of acceptable terror targets too?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News