Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Lloyd who wrote (11589)	11/30/2001 1:03:42 PM
From: NOW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Say Don: would you consider starting a new thread to share this unusually uncommon common sense witht the rest of us? Reading you is like reading Chomsky: at first I nothing penetrates, then when it does, my eyes open wide and I say: ahhah! thats it!

To: Don Lloyd who wrote (11589)	11/30/2001 9:12:44 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Thanks Don. Meanwhile, my idol, Uncle Green$pan continues to confirm my theories: Message 16729683 Re those comments you made, wouldn't the Fed cut money supply if demand was dropping, causing inflation, by not lending US$? That would reduce the number of dollars circulating, [or, as you say, in cash balances], which would mean each dollar would be worth more, which would maintain the currency's value. My understanding is the Fed can simply decide, "Hey!" [which is what they say in the USA when suggesting something], "Why don't we write out a Fed check for $1billion and lend it to Citibank [which has a good capital base] and we can earn [currently] 2% or so out of thin air?" If the US$ is deflating, they might as well do that in the interests of avoiding deflation and making some profit for themselves. If money is going out of fashion and few people want US$ cash balances, preferring to own shares, then shares and other assets and investments will go up in price and hot potato dollars will be unwanted, so inflation will take off. Then, to maintain the constant value of the US$ the Fed seeks, they can, when the Citibank loan falls due, simply cancel the credit to Citibank, which immediately reduces the amount of money out there looking for a cash balance to sit in or something to buy. Which will reduce inflation, maintaining the value of money at a constant level. Or, they could raise interest rates again and thereby make people think it would be better to hold those $$ after all. It's a fun roller coaster. Mqurice

To: Don Lloyd who wrote (11589)	12/1/2001 5:28:40 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 74559

Hi Don - do Austrians have a theoretical explanation for scrip? That's one of the things that fascinates me. It's clear that, in olden days, at least, from time to time there would be a problem because there was not enough physical money around to effectuate transactions, so people would invent something to act as a marker. The American History Museum has a very extensive collection of early American paper money and scrip, some issued by states, some by banks, some by towns, some by private institutions. One of my fellow students works with the money collection at the Smithsonian. He told me that during the Great Depression, the problem of insufficient physical money was solved, in part, by stores issuing paper money. After the semester is over, I am going to visit his office and he's going to show me some of it.