Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SOROS who wrote (9720)	11/30/2001 10:46:19 PM
From: MSI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Ok, to begin: NVDA selling equity is good because it doesn't cause leverage risk or "house of cards". It only causes equity risk for loss of value, but increases company health and LESSENS risk of bk. Eventually, if it's a well-run company, values will improve, unless you postulate bk of the whole economy, which ain't going to happen. The gov't running deeply in the red is typical of Republican administrations since Reagan, but we can afford even more now than we did then, several trillion more, since our economy is almost twice what it was then. <"Does anyone else think it strange that Bin Laden said he did not do it, and those girls that were released were not abused..." A lot of things are strange about this, and are to be suspect. We have long had criminals and incompetents at the highest levels of gov't and business, but what else is new ... We'll succeed as an economy in spite of those criminals, and sometimes because of them... The collective inventiveness and productivity of the national output far outweighs, for example, the entire DOD budget, by 30:1 A mission I have is reduction of secrecy in all branches of gov't which I claim is actually a drag on the economy as well as a threat to national well-being, as criminality always grows in dark places like certain parts of the fed gov't. But, I'm heartened by growing objections to hardship and Big Brother-ism so easily espoused by the administration, and by skeptics such as yourself willing to ask the big questions.