SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sig who wrote (167958)12/1/2001 5:38:12 PM
From: John Koligman  Respond to of 176387
 
Sig, which probably means, at least in the shorter term, it might be wise to take short term trading profits since 9/11... NAS has come a long way.

Regards,
John

Value Techs

By Rhonda Brammer

September 11 changed everything and probably forever. It changed the world: the way we look at the world and the way the world looks at us. It changed, in some degree or another, how we work and how we play. And, inevitably, it changed how we invest. Let us take, for example, the stock market's performance pre- and post-September 11. Before that fateful day, as the shadow of recession lengthened over the economy, the market was rather a forbidding place. But some parts of it, as always, were less hostile than others.

More specifically, our own special investment province, small stocks, turned in a doughtier showing than their bigger and celebrated brethren. The Russell 2000, a decent proxy for smaller stocks, had declined 9% through September 10 -- roughly half the 17% drop of the S&P 500. Even more noteworthy, however, was how much small value stocks were outperforming small growth stocks. Thus, from the beginning of the year through September 10, while the Russell 2000 Growth Index fell 21%, the Russell 2000 Value Index was actually in positive territory -- up 3%.

But once the market bottomed on September 21, things changed, and dramatically. Big stocks and small stocks moved up pretty much in tandem -- the S&P by 18% and the Russell 2000 by 22%, respectively. Growth, however, forged ahead of value. From September 21 through Thursday, the Russell 2000 Value Index advanced 18%, while the Russell 2000 Growth Index was up a dandy 27%.


On closer inspection, it emerges that what has been really gunning the market for the past couple of months are big tech stocks. Since September 21, as the accompanying chart vividly illustrates, the tech-loaded Nasdaq 100 has soared a blazing 43%, more than twice the none-too-shabby 19% rise in the broad market, best measured by the Wilshire 5000.

As to what lit the fire under techs, we sought authoritative insight from a fellow who's no stranger to the market as a whole and the sector in particular.

"A lot of it is outright speculation," says Scott Black, Barron's Roundtable member and proprietor of Boston-based Delphi Management. "It's the same hot list you had 18 months ago -- all the old favorites -- PMC Sierra, up 150%; JDS Uniphase, up 140%; Ciena, up 130%." While their stocks have recently taken wing, the first two companies are losing a slug of money and the profitable one, Ciena, is going for a mind-boggling 160 times trailing earnings.

Which explains why, although a long-time tech investor, he's busily reducing his portfolio's exposure to technology. No reflection on the quality of the companies, he insists. Pure and simple, he's lightening up because the stocks are ahead of themselves.

MKS Instruments, bought in the mid-teens, he has been selling in the mid-20s ("it's close to five times book and losing money"). Gone, too, is most of Lam Research, picked up around 16 in October 2000 and sold at an average price of about 28 before September 11 ("earnings are rolling over" and there's increased "competition from Applied Materials"). LTX, purchased around 10-11 over a year ago, was entirely cleaned out long before September 11 at around 26 ("three or four times book and absolutely no earnings").

When pressed, however, Scott allowed as he is buying a couple of small tech stocks whose stock prices are off 75%-80% from their highs. Both companies are losing money but boast robust finances and, in the next 12 months, he expects the stocks to double.



To: Sig who wrote (167958)12/1/2001 5:50:17 PM
From: John Koligman  Respond to of 176387
 
Techs Continue Tradition of a Fourth-Quarter Rally

By Andrew Bary

Vital Signs

The Nasdaq continued its remarkable rally from its late September low last week, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Standard & Poor's 500 fell back.

Boosted by gains in Intel, Cisco Systems and Sun Microsystems, the Nasdaq added 27 points to close at 1930, a 1.4% rise, although the index gave up two points on Friday. The Dow fell 108 points, or 1.1%, to close at 9851 last week, despite a 22-point gain Friday. The S&P 500 had a percentage loss similar to the Dow, falling 12 points, or 1%, to 1137, in the five sessions.

Since it bottomed on September 21 at 1423, the Nasdaq has risen over 500 points, a 35% gain, although the index is still down nearly 22% this year. If technology stocks hold their gains through the end of the year, it will mark the fourth straight year that the tech sector has experienced a 30%-plus move in the fourth quarter.

It's no surprise that outsized tech moves in absolute terms, and relative to the overall market, have become routine. The fourth quarter has become especially volatile for tech stocks, partly because aggressive investors, including many hedge funds, are desperately trying to generate good performance for the year and qualify for incentive fees that are the lifeblood of that business, according to Steve Galbraith, the new chief domestic strategist at Morgan Stanley.


Galbraith pointed out last week in a note to clients that the tech sector of the S&P 500, which bottomed at 50 times estimated 2001 profits and 33 times projected 2002 earnings, now commands 68 times 2001 earnings and 45 times projected 2002 profits. The 2002 tech price-earnings multiple is about double that of the S&P 500. "Amazingly, the tech sector now trades at virtually the same multiple of forward earnings as it did at the height of the tech bubble" in 2000, Galbraith wrote. Tech earnings are lower now than in 2000, but the stocks are discounting a recovery to those peak levels. Galbraith's view is that given the tech rally, "less bad" news will no longer be enough to lift the group. "Genuinely good news" will be needed, he maintains.

One sign of a tougher investor attitude came Friday, when Novellus Systems, a semiconductor-equipment maker, fell 3.53 to 38.07, after announcing disappointing fourth-quarter orders. Novellus' news hurt the entire semiconductor-equipment group, including industry leader Applied Materials, which fell 1.71 to 39.74 in the session. Conditions generally are poor in the semiconductor industry, but investors have bid up the prices of the equipment stocks on hopes for a 2003 rebound. Indeed, many tech stocks now are trading on 2003 profit hopes.

Cisco, which rose 0.85 to 20.44, trades for around 100 times projected profits in its current fiscal year ending in July and for about 40 times estimated 2003 profits of 50 cents a share. Intel, up 1.60 to 32.66 in the five sessions, fetches around 50 times estimated 2002 profits of 65 cents a share. Both Intel and Cisco were boosted last week on investor hopes that the two companies will offer good news when they provide updates on business conditions this week. Sun Microsystems, which now is operating in the red, rose 1.63 to 14.24 in the five sessions.

Richard Bernstein, the chief quantitative strategist at Merrill Lynch, says what's notable about the current stock market is the "absolute certainty" exhibited by investors about the prospects for economic recovery. "Normally, you don't see that kind of certainty during a recession," Bernstein says. He sees "tremendous opportunities" outside technology in such areas as health care, consumer staples and utilities. Says Bernstein, "Investors ask me: 'How can you favor safe-haven stocks when everyone knows the economy is turning around?' " His response: cyclical issues, including tech, already discount a recovery.



To: Sig who wrote (167958)12/3/2001 11:32:43 AM
From: kemble s. matter  Respond to of 176387
 
Sig,
Hi!! DELL is coming in with some amazing results that many are ignoring with this economic environment...I keep thinking of the past and if it will repeat itself...That DEC acquisition was something that taught me a ton about DELL...If CPQ and HWP get married I'm sure the celebration will not be in Houston but a few miles north... :o) It will be a horrendous transition and who knows how long... and if it will be a success...Sales reps at DELL can't wait for the break in the tech spending...The scenario is almost too perfect...Historically, DELL grew at their all time highs for market share during that DEC acquisition...By all standards that was peanuts compared to what CPQ is attempting to do with HWP...We could be on another "RUN MIKEY RUN" similar to the old days...Michael's statement about 40% and $100 billion has been around a long time...The economic funk surely derailed this prediction...Yet, I find it interesting he dug it back up around the time of the CPQ/HWP announcement... :o)

Best, Kemble