Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. T. who wrote (206186)	12/1/2001 7:50:38 AM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Guess they can't count on that money in the next reelection.

To: E. T. who wrote (206186)	12/1/2001 7:54:27 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

e.t. this company was a top contributor. This company is now bankrupt. So in California the President was accused of not responding to energy prices fast enough. In both cases it would see President used his MBA wisdom to do the right thing. Well we could have had a divinity school drop out with very poor math skills. gore always fails recounts. note: from what you posted. Enron is not among the energy companies holding one of the now controversial contracts to supply the state with power over the next decade. S. David Freeman, California's chief negotiator for those contracts, said Enron was simply asking too much money for its electricity. So today a company is bankrupt that gave money to the President. Also California under gray dumber than dirt davis has so much energy that it's selling it for 20 cents on the dollar. I just don't see the connection that suggests corruption. Enron spent more money than it had and the President did not bale them out even though they had been a top contributor. California bought more energy than it needed because the guy in charge is retarded and there seem to be no need for the President to assist dummy davis to tie his shoes. tom watson tosiwmee