Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (40110)	12/3/2001 1:52:41 PM
From: angelachase	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

"we could just as easily write another that said the opposite and it would be just as valid." ****************** Especially if God is directing the writing, you really get a lot of validity. submission.org

To: Greg or e who wrote (40110)	12/3/2001 2:17:31 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 82486

"I don't think the same can be said for Atheists and Agnostics. What is your basis for these?" OOps it looks like I barged in, in the middle of things...again. Well, I believe in God but am somewhat of an agnostic/skeptic about atheism. And I figure some if not most atheists and agnostics have self evidence of the human condition including an intuitive/instinctive knowing of what are the rights and responsibilities of a human being. They simply don't use scriptural evidence to confirm what they already know. The one's who post on this thread claim a moral foundation that is similar to my own but insist that it is a social invention, developmental, and historical. Most deny self evidence is a real phenomenon...which I must admit is confusing to me.