SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tony Viola who wrote (150803)12/3/2001 3:36:25 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
AMD generally blamed ASPs for the quarterly loss, if I recall. Trying to recall Hector's words re yields during the Q3 end CC and their recent webcast. Nothing comes to mind right away, but I think they've been claiming good yields all along. ?!?!

I believe Hector claimed "world class" yields which creates a sticky problem. How does he reconcile processor shipments with fab capacity and still make that claim?

We have been assuming full factory loading. If Hector is telling the truth, the only way to make things work is to assume about 33% utilization of their Fabs. Considering that AMD is selling processors at a steep loss, it would mean that they can only give away about 1/3 of what they could make. Any way you look at it things stink over at AMD.

We know about Jerry but Hector wouldn't lie to us, would he?

EP



To: Tony Viola who wrote (150803)12/3/2001 3:38:46 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 186894
 
Tony - Re: "AMD generally blamed ASPs for the quarterly loss, if I recall. "

Of course they did - do you think AMD ever blames themselves for their massive f*ck ups?

Heck - anybody can make money with ASPs above $100 - but AMD LOSES money with ASPs below $75.

Paul