SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: keokalani'nui who wrote (5043)12/3/2001 5:59:28 PM
From: Biomaven  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
Someone noted the PCYC implied volatility:

(NASDAQ:PCYC) Pharmacyclics, Inc. (NM)

U.S. Options-Pharmacyclics vols stay high, volume up
-Dec 3, 2001 05:22 PM (Reuters)
-http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=25590377

=======================================================
CHICAGO, Dec 3 (Reuters) - Implied volatility stayed high
on Monday in options on cancer drug maker Pharmacyclics Inc.
(NASDAQ:PCYC) for at least the fifth consecutive session, while
options volume picked up again as the stock pulled back after
its recent ascent.
Near Monday's close, roughly 1,195 calls and 550 puts had
changed hands on the Philadelphia Stock Exchange. That exceeded
average daily turnover during the last 20 trading sessions of
about 315 contracts, and was the highest one-day options
turnover since mid-August 2000, when a similar number of
options changed hands, according to Track Data figures.
Last week, options volume popped up Nov. 26 for a single
session to more than 1,500 contracts, Track Data showed.
Options volume on Monday also tilted toward calls as the
stock lost ground, reversing the trend of the few most recent
sessions when put volume dominated as the stock advanced,
perhaps as players tried to protect profits.
An American-style call option gives its buyer the right to
purchase the underlying stock at a specific strike price any
time during the option's life. A put conveys a similar right to
the buyer except to sell the underlying stock.
The options specialist on the PHLX trading floor declined
to comment on Monday's activity, citing company policy.
"I've got it in the 94th percentile of implied volatility,"
said Sage Douglas, research assistant with McMillan Analysis
Corp., of Pharmacyclics options. He said implied vols for all
the option's strikes and expiries was 140.5 percent, up from an
average lifetime implied of around 125 percent and well above
the 100-percent level on Nov. 16 just before the stock and
implied vols began rising in tandem.
"So it is toward the more expensive end," he added of the
implied volatility level recently.
Implied volatility measures as a percentage how much the
options market thinks the stock price will move during the
option's life.
The stock's 20-day historical volatility, or how much the
stock actually has moved during that time, was 60 percent.
That movement -- rising implied volatility as the stock
advanced -- caught Douglas' attention because implied volatility
typically declines as the stock rises and rises as the stock
drops, reflecting the lesser likelihood a stock will run as far
on the upside as it tends to move the downside.
"A stock runup with high implied volatility means there
could be some news," he added. "There might be something going
on because implied volatility doesn't rise for no reason. If
the reason is right, is another question. We don't know why."

Stock of Sunnyvale, California-based Pharmacyclics had
ratcheted upward from an intraday trough of $14.54 hit on Sept.
25 to an intraday high of $28.12 on Nov. 26.
The stock closed on Monday at $24.41, down $1.11 or 4.35
percent, on the Nasdaq. Volume was 309,800 shares.

Copyright 2001, Reuters News Service


(emphasis added).

"[M]ight be something going on" is right - they are due to announce their Phase III results, allegedly this month.

Peter

P.S. I've been long March calls for a while now.



To: keokalani'nui who wrote (5043)12/3/2001 6:42:52 PM
From: quidditch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
Wilder, I checked the disclosures on the afternoon note and company summary issued 9/19/01 (when, by the way, the price was $33 and change) and it does not appear that Goldman has done any underwriting for MEDI.

quid