SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (40425)12/4/2001 4:34:40 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Wrong. Libel per se, that is statements which go to a person's trade or business do not require proof of any damages, if I was so inclined....

From Black's Law Dictionary:
libel per se

Definition
libel that is actionable without the plaintiff introducing additional facts to show defamation or claiming special damages



To: The Philosopher who wrote (40425)12/4/2001 4:39:21 PM
From: Greg or e  Respond to of 82486
 
If JLA could show that his character is being maligned in a public forum, and that someone knew it was him that was being talked about. In other words if it could be shown that he did suffer a loss of reputation, then there may be a case. At any rate JLA could represent himself and it would only cost him time, while it could get very expensive for Win, as you of course pointed out.

Whatever,
LOL


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News