Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Fischofer who wrote (8500)	12/5/2001 7:20:49 AM
From: Frederick Smart	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

The Natural Definition of "Rational" >>I can only conclude that we're speaking different languages here. That's OK but what you're saying is that the universe has a rational basis (based on prime numbers) which cannot be communicated by rational means. Wouldn't it be simpler to drop the supposition of rational basis especially since we "don't need definitions, labels and conditions"?>> Throw out your definitions. It's not "rational" to "define" that - something unlimited - which cannot be defined. Instead of "definining" our way deeper into this insane Black Hole of misunderstanding fueled by lables, limits, boundaries and restictions which really don't exist - "let go" and release yourself to this unlimited "process of becoming." Prime numbers and numbers in general already do this. They already exist. They already just "are." It's up to us to shed the restrictions, lables and limits of our insane natural understanding and embrace more of what we truely "are" which is energy, light and Love that is infinite and forever just "becoming." Peace. Light! ONE - LOVE! GO!! Light!