Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Fischofer who wrote (8502)	12/4/2001 9:41:41 PM
From: James Calladine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

All those terms are in the realm of duality (opposites), used by the ego to describe various value judgments "about" what the ego observes or feels to be true. But even though these value judgments are "projected" to say something about something or other, they really talk about the ego's own internal valuing and NOTHING else. So, yes, Bill, I agree with your comment. Namaste! Jim

To: Bill Fischofer who wrote (8502)	12/5/2001 7:29:37 AM
From: Frederick Smart	Respond to of 28931

Either Light or Darkness.... >>CWG states that 'good' and 'evil', 'right' and 'wrong', 'hot' and 'cold', 'up' and 'down', etc. are all aspects of the relative which exist to provide a contextual field in which we can announce and declare, create and experience Who We Are and Who We Choose to Be. They have no absolute meaning. Thus to say that "mankind is inherently evil (or good)" is like saying "mankind is inherently tall (or short)".>> Yes. Light. Or Darkness. Love. Or Hate. Either we are consumers of energy, light and Love. Or we are "receivers" that freely share, give and shine this energy, light and Love with others. Either we make claims which sow blame and shame. Or we make no claims and thus step into the ONE Light of our Father's Love. Peace. Light! ONE - LOVE! GO!!