Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bela_ghoulashi who wrote (12789)	12/4/2001 10:33:24 PM
From: LPS5	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Individual nuts are individual nuts. Period. That's exactly what I'm saying. That no extremist sect is less violence prone than another particular sect of extremists. I think your statements are bigoted...[j]ust because you've made them about fundamentalist Christians does not exclude them from being bigotry. BIG-ot (n): one intolerantly devoted to his own church, party, or opinion. Oddly, you seem pretty adamant in the defense you've mounted of one particular religion...fitting the above definition (from Merriam-Webster) more closely than my attempt to present an all-encompassing picture that excludes no particular religion. Again: my opinion is that the fundamentalist sect of any religion, bar none, is dangerous. In fact, I named both Islam and Christianity, not just the latter. And there are certainly plenty more. If anyone, you're the bigot, pal. LP.