Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Cash who wrote (10643)	12/5/2001 10:50:13 AM
From: Math Junkie	Respond to of 99280

Zeev admits to being fallible on a regular basis.

To: Jim Cash who wrote (10643)	12/5/2001 10:57:01 AM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99280

Nobody is here cause they force them too. Take everything with a grain of salt and do your own decisions. Nobody is putting the knife in your throat. That's true for Larry's calls, Zeev's calls, my calls, anybody's calls.

To: Jim Cash who wrote (10643)	12/5/2001 10:59:51 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 99280

I am not sure what you are talking about, if I have "followers", they use stop losses to stop massacres and they don't commit more than 2% to any positions, so even when it gores to zero (and you could have used a better example like AREM for that), that is it. You sound angry at me, but I cannot remember a single case where I wrote a single harsh word directed to you, so, please, what is the problem? The fact that my "calls" are "open ended" (whatever that is). These calls are wrong from time to times (obviously, like the last call for a maximum run to 1940 if 1815 is breached and the current suggestion that by the end of this week we should be back under 1900). By the way, is an open ended "call" a good thing or a bad thing? Zeev