To: wanna_bmw who wrote (151154 ) 12/5/2001 11:49:05 AM From: AK2004 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894 bmw re: before you accuse a huge company of conducting illegal activities, you ought to expect what the outcome will be for your remarks. am I getting sued already or "snake" is my punishment for now? BTW I said that Intel constantly changing their accounting which is not illegal but, come to think of it, it should be re: at the expense of decency yet another one, I have not provide any false info re: you shouldn't go around trolling people with your open ended sarcasm, only to get offended when they take your bait. well, I am not really offended. Your insults are far milder than Paul's and Tony's :-)). As far as trolling, I do not want to look for excuses but you should read reactions to my posts claiming that I am here to undermine the supreme authority of mighty intel . Just read back your own posts, you constantly do or agree with observations of my "ignorance" and "evil" intentions. Trust me, I would rather have a normal conversations. re: again, your sarcasm suggested otherwise. not really, in the ideal case it is obligation of any public company to do what they can within the law for their shareholders. Unfortunately, near term gains very often interpreted as shareholders interests which lead to borrowing against future and to a degree misleading the investors. All large companies do that including Intel and amd. It seems though that intel is pushing it a bit farther than some other companies. re: slinging the bullshit and spreading the FUD. you aren't fooling anyone. it is you that owes the apology. wow, I did upset you. I was sarcastic, I admit it, but I did not post any false info as you claim. There is a difference between Paul and Co (you included) and I - I do not lie. Even if I would want to I would not because of SEC, I am a pro Regards -Misleading Snake