Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jjkirk who wrote (12853)	12/5/2001 12:47:53 PM
From: MSI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Hi jjkirk, I'm more afraid of secret trials, than of publicizing a debate on the truth. If "secret codes" are the issue it can be a closed courtroom with videotaped excerpts, and direct broadcasts delayed. I can't imagine any claims made in court that could be any worse than the daily indoctrination in those damned schools and mosques of hate. The previous WTC bomber's trial was not a "circus", it exposed the criminals for what they are, and propaganda failed to convince otherwise. Their belief system is corrupt and will continue to fall apart with public examination, rather than the way it has flourished in the past, in secret one-sided promotion in their classes to young people. I would expect any broadcasts of trials would be banned from Taliban-type classrooms, since questions are asked that are dangerous to their vulnerable belief system. Did you happen to catch the tv show that had the suicide-bomber's bomb maker? He was asked what he'd like to do - he said, not be a suicide bomber! He wanted to study computer science in the US, as I recall. The ugly truth is that they have kept themselves back by fighting among themselves and dead-end violent extortion funded by petrodollars. A televised global debate would do that issue some good, imo