Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SecularBull who wrote (207310)	12/5/2001 6:07:29 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Respond to of 769670

Nope. Not -- rather, 'nary' -- -g- a one. 'Father' describes the 'sire'? LMAO -- is that better? involved who produces the sperm that fertilizes an egg -- ovum -- in the 'Mother' -- female -- at the point where 'conception' takes place. You seem to be thinking that I use the descriptor, 'father,' out of some religiosity-based -g- language -- reflecting a certain 'belief system' ... I am not, I can assure you. Help me out with this new trend of medieval bible-speak, will you? I'm having a lot of trouble teaching myself to speak in terms of evil and crusades and ... and ... what, the blessed vs. the damned .. hell fire and hades and ... you know ... all that stuff... How exactly do you 'PC-pro-lifers' refer to the male receptacle of the necessary semen to produce fertilization? -g- bia

To: SecularBull who wrote (207310)	12/5/2001 8:18:46 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Oops ... hey Secular: Sorry .. I see what you mean. I made a typo in one of my posts today regarding the 'male importance' in the role of fertilizing eggs that produce pregnancies ... No wonder you're confused. This is what I meant to say: <<In any case, the 'permission' of the male source of the pregnancy -- or even the knowledge that this source is involved -- is [Edit] NOT required in order for a woman to have an abortion.>> From my post around noon today: Message 16749487 Sorry to have inadvertantly created such a maelstrom of misunderstanding in your mind about my comments regarding abortion rights of women who get them through yet another typo. Typos have the potential to ruin things ... and often do, such as printing hundreds of thousands of catalogs for tech products, for example...I've collected lists of such that are hilarious ... although, harmless ... in terms of actual 'damage' to human beings ... not... this is stuff like: For a snooty country club member newsletter in the pool news section one summer ... board wanted to make a point ... this almost got through final edit/approval from client: "Reminder: Please clothe swimming babes." LOL. Didn't want babies in the club pool in the buff. bia