Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (56998)	12/5/2001 5:02:17 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	Respond to of 70976

I'm going to have to think about that. Not sure. Can't I rest on my laurels? My first random guess would be that, all through 2002, we have a lot of volatility, with no net upward movement in the Nas, ending at around 2000 (within 8 standard deviations). stockcharts.com[h,a]dahlnymy[d19980901,20011210][pb50!b200!f][vc60] The 9/01 and 10/98 Nas double bottom (1357 and 1387) forms very solid support, I doubt we take that out. The 5/01 high (2328) is near the lows of 1/01, 2/99, and 3/99, and we might stall there. But resistance lines have been falling easily, and liquidity/momentum/hope could keep on doing that for an indefinite (but not infinite) time period. I doubt we reach the 5/00 lows, at 3042. So, I'm predicting the Nas in a range of 1357 to 3042, which is a range so broad, it's useless. OK, I'll quit wasting bandwidth. Maybe I'll have something usefull to say later. Gotta go skiing.