Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (65014)	12/5/2001 10:58:20 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

AMD says 2 of the top 5 selling retail systems in Japan are using.... Duron? amd.com And that Duron is outselling celeron in Western Europe. Maybe that 30% is closer than we thought... If 35 million PCs are sold in Q4, AMD needs to sell 10.5 million to make it to a 30% share. 1 in 10 chance? OTOH, 25% market share is looking doable, even likely.

To: Win Smith who wrote (65014)	12/6/2001 3:28:15 AM
From: TGPTNDR	Respond to of 275872

Win, Re: <Jump table vs Hash table.> that makes a whole lot more sense. But Sparse and dense as he's using the terms still don't. When I use Sparse I mean a variety of conditions from essentially empty to full but without multiple look-ups for a single entry, and when I use dense I mean out of hash addresses had to be created to handle the data(and that can happen even in an essentially empty table if the hash is incorrectly chosen). But I would use both in the context of a hash table and neither in the context of a jmp table. In either case I continue to think they're chasing this thing in the wrong direction. At the very least they ought to be able to take the .asm and strip out the irrelavent stuff to get to the core of what they're trying to figure out, then publish, compile, and execute that. And if they're blood and gore types they ought to be able to take the exe from the .asm compile and tune that also. PS -- My Internet connection is slower tonight than I can ever remember it being. It looks to me like ATT is having real problems swallowing @home. C:\WINDOWS>tracert www.siliconinvestor.com Tracing route to v10.go2net.com [206.253.217.10] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 9 ms 13 ms 8 ms 10.58.220.1 2 8 ms 9 ms 9 ms r1-fe2-1.adubn1.nj.home.net [24.12.106.129] 3 11 ms 11 ms 12 ms r1-ge2-2.jamison1.pa.home.net [24.18.63.193] 4 11 ms * * r1-ge5-0.wyn1.pa.home.net [24.2.5.1] 5 * * 12 ms bb1-srp2-0.rdc2.pa.home.net [216.197.151.81] 6 * * 12 ms c1-pos4-1.phlapa1.home.net [24.7.76.169] 7 12 ms * 12 ms c1-pos6-0.cmdnnj1.home.net [24.7.65.225] 8 16 ms 15 ms 15 ms c1-pos1-0.washdc1.home.net [24.7.65.85] 9 16 ms 21 ms * home-gw.wswdc.ip.att.net [192.205.32.253] 10 17 ms 20 ms 17 ms gbr3-p50.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.123.9.50] 11 26 ms 25 ms * gbr3-p80.n54ny.ip.att.net [12.122.2.165] 12 60 ms * 58 ms gbr3-p30.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.2.173] 13 * 58 ms 58 ms gbr4-p60.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.1.126] 14 79 ms * * gbr4-p30.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.122.2.229] 15 79 ms 80 ms * gbr2-p100.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.122.5.170] 16 80 ms 80 ms 80 ms gar2-p370.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.123.44.117] 17 84 ms 84 ms 84 ms 12.124.173.38 18 * 84 ms * border23s.ge2-0-bbnet1.sea.pnap.net [206.253.192 .160] 19 * 85 ms * v10.go2net.com [206.253.217.10] 20 85 ms 83 ms 84 ms v10.go2net.com [206.253.217.10] tgpntdr