Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Srexley who wrote (207625)	12/6/2001 2:12:21 PM
From: Dr. Doktor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

As Ashcroft himself says: Attorney General John Ashcroft lashed out Thursday at critics of the administration's response to terrorism, saying questions about whether its actions undermine the Constitution only serve to help terrorists. "To those who pit Americans against immigrants, citizens against non-citizens, to those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists for they erode our national unity and diminish our resolve," Ashcroft told the Senate Judiciary Committee. "They give ammunition to America's enemies and pause to America's friends. They encourage people of good will to remain silent in the face of evil. "Our efforts have been crafted carefully to avoid infringing on constitutional rights, while saving American lives." Ashcroft flatly rejected criticism of the administration's policies, including President Bush's decision to allow the use of military tribunals to try non-U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism, the detention of hundreds of immigrants in connection with the terrorism probe, the "voluntary" questioning of thousands of men from mostly Middle Eastern countries, and eavesdropping between attorneys and their clients in terrorism cases. DOC

To: Srexley who wrote (207625)	12/6/2001 2:29:38 PM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I agree with checks and balances. I think there is good historical precedent to show that checks and balance have value for a society that wants remain free and democratic.

To: Srexley who wrote (207625)	12/6/2001 2:44:03 PM
From: DOUG H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I think I'll contact the lying dirtbag. Peter Montgomery or Jeremy Leaming 202-467-4999