To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (4993 ) 12/6/2001 4:06:38 PM From: isopatch Respond to of 36161 George. Thx. That clarifies your "swing posting" to some extent But if that IS what you REALLY think? There was no reason to post Hussmans piece in the first place. There was no bullish thesis there. And you, by contrast, are now saying you think we're in "a new Bull Market". Come on George! There are any number of easily available cut and pastes from all over the web that reflect what you're now saying your market view is vs John Hussmans - pedal to the metal - super bearism !!!!!!!!!!!!. For crying out loud, compared to that dood, me and Sly look like Bulls<LOLl> Here's how I see it. You hang out on Zevs thread for a while, come back here a raging bull. Then after you read us for a while? You're a raging bear. Hence, cut and paste of a super bear Hussman head banger<G> Because you always have more cash in your account than money at risk, you have no convictions and just bounce back and forth like a ping pong ball between opinions like you do threads. Don't want to be mean spirited about this. I do read your posts and find some of them interesting, George. And we do share some common approaches to sentiment analysis, etc. And long time readers know I've tipped the virtual hat to ya on many occasions. BUT.....and it's a biggie.<G> Granted all of us are sometimes in high cash positions. That's just prudent trading IMHO. But because you ALWAYS seem to have a lot more cash than anything else in what is supposedly an.... "INVESTMENT ACCOUNT"? You precisely meet my definition "an armchair investor". You can be interesting to read in the abstract sense. But the guys who "walk the walk" here are the center of my attention They put SERIOUS amounts of their $$$$ behind their statements. So when THEY post? They my full attention. No hard feelings, OK? Isopatch