SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mitch-c who wrote (57073)12/6/2001 6:59:01 PM
From: Math Junkie  Respond to of 70976
 
OT - checking everything

When I worked as an engineer, I used to be amused when people would bring a troubleshooting problem to me with an attitude of "this can't be solved," as if the laws of physics had repealed themselves for their benefit. But it sounds like networks have gotten to a sufficient level of complexity that it can take real stubbornness to track down the problem.

WRT Murphy Field, when I was in college some of my engineering student roommates and I were trying to troubleshoot a car electrical system, and after we had checked everything, it worked. Note that I said checked, not fixed. We didn't actually do anything to make it work. So we concluded that all that was required to make things work was to go through the formal proof. <g>



To: mitch-c who wrote (57073)12/6/2001 7:44:26 PM
From: ratan lal  Respond to of 70976
 
More often, though, there are details upon details of choices, timing, software, and settings involved in connecting computers together

I used to work for RCA way way back. One customer had a main frame computer that constantly gave random errors. We went out there and after 6-weeks isolated it to a ground wire that had a cold solder joint.