To: macavity who wrote (5225 ) 12/7/2001 1:58:12 PM From: John Pitera Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421 This briefing article from today, dovetails some of our recent talk on Japan. ------------------- Should They, Or Shouldn't They? 07-Dec-01 00:05 ET There has been an ever-increasing amount of speculation that the BoJ will buy foreign bonds to accelerate the quantitative easing process. While we still have our doubts about the ultimate credibility of such a plan, we are somewhat surprised by the amount of support that has been generated outside of the more traditional factions of the Japanese government. The idea of foreign bond buying really began to pick up steam a few weeks ago in the wake of a series of articles in the Financial Times . The articles highlighted the need for the BoJ to step-up its easing campaign in an effort to combat what had become a very real deflationary spiral in Japan. Given the lack of traditional policy options however, it was argued that monetary expansion should focus on more radical measures such as the purchase of unwanted assets, or perhaps foreign securities and currencies. Not surprisingly, the politicians have been quick to pick up on this story, as they have long-tried to put the burden of recovery on the BoJ in an effort to appease their small business and construction constituencies that would feel the brunt of aggressive structural reform. In addition, current account expansion through foreign bond purchases offers another means of stimulus that has long been a favorite of Japan, a weaker yen. This is where we begin to have our doubts about the viability of such a plan. Aside from the fact that foreign exchange intervention is the exclusive domain of the Ministry of Finance, we are also a bit skeptical about the BoJ's willingness to further expand its current balance given the dampened multiplier effect surrounding the banking sector's unwillingness to lend Not to be outdone, we are also afraid that the competitive pressures of a protracted global slowdown could unleash a wave of unwanted backlash towards Japan. However, a recent article in the Nikkei reported that Japan has already secured the support of influential White House economic advisor Larry Lindsey, who noted that "it is an idea to encourage the effectiveness of monetary easing ." In addition, even the OECD has endorsed the move, suggesting in its economic survey of Japan released earlier this week that current account expansion through foreign bond purchases would help the bank avoid a further inflation of the JGB bubble. Even more surprising may be the fact that the BoJ seems to be warming up to the idea, as board member Nakahara actually proposed foreign bond purchases of roughly Y200 bln a month at the October 29 meeting . While Nakahara's plan was voted down by an eight to one margin, BoJ board member Miki said Thursday that currency intervention and foreign bond buying should be considered as a possible addition to traditional measures such as JGB buying and fiscal stimulus. While we have been surprised by the extent of the support for foreign bond buying, we have our doubts about its credibility as a recovery tool. The burden of non-performing loans on the banking should continue to make it extremely difficult for an increase in base money to filter through to the broader aggregates. Perhaps even more importantly, any attempt to use monetary policy as a means of avoiding structural reform should be considered inherently unproductive. This thought actually fits quite nicely with the stimulative effects of a weaker yen, which would only exacerbate the flow of capital to competitively disadvantaged sectors of the economy that need to shed, not add capacity. In other words, while we respect the near-term inverse correlation between the yen and the Nikkei, we would be skeptical about the recovery signals coming from a rise in Japanese stocks on the back of what essentially would be a competitive devaluation of the yen.