Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Srexley who wrote (208030)	12/7/2001 2:07:52 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

President Bush beats dashie again. AP news Senate GOP Backs Bush, Derails Defense Bill Bearing More Anti-Terrorism Spending Than President Wants By Alan Fram Associated Press Writer Published: Dec 7, 2001 WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate voted Friday to derail this year's defense bill as Republicans rallied behind President Bush in opposition to legislation that contains more anti-terrorism spending than he wants. Though the $318 billion defense measure seemed sure to be revived soon, the near party-line vote meant the end for the $35 billion package Democrats had attached to it. The spending plan was their response to the Sept. 11 attacks. The Democrats' defeat was a triumph for Bush, who had threatened to veto the entire defense measure if the anti-terror plan it carried exceeded $20 billion. In the 50-50 vote, Republicans got nine votes more than the 41 they needed on their procedural motion upending the bill. Sen. Russell Feingold of Wisconsin was the only Democrat to side with the GOP. Realizing that defeat was probable, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., told reporters that Democrats would next offer an alternative $20 billion package, the size Bush has demanded. Aides said it would provide more money for New York and fighting bioterrorism than the president has proposed. Daschle and Democrats had believed they might succeed by attracting support from Republicans leery of voting against efforts to enhance domestic security. They also thought the battle would help them paint Bush as not paying enough attention to going after terrorism at home. Asked about the Democrats' willingness to limit spending to $20 billion, Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., said, "If it is, that would be a major step forward." But Sen. Robert Byrd, chief author of the Democrats' $35 billion package, lashed out at the vote that Republicans were ready to win. "This vote sends the message that it's more important to win a political battle than it is to win the war against terrorism," said Byrd, D-W.Va. Even before the vote, Bush's veto threat had seemed unbeatable because Republicans had pledged to sustain it. Republicans were ready to force a vote on their $20 billion anti-terror package that offered more than the president's for New York, bioterrorism and food safety. The GOP version contained less money than the Democrats' plan for defense, federal law enforcement and border security. Democratic leaders were worried the Republican proposal might attract enough Democrats support to pass. That led Democrats to weigh in with their own anti-terror package. Bush has said he will seek more money early next year, but that enough money already is flowing to cover the next few weeks. Three days after the attacks, Congress approved $40 billion to fight terrorists. Bush was given control of half; lawmakers must vote anew on the details of the second $20 billion. Republicans say there was agreement to limit the spending to $40 billion, while Democrats say that was just a starting point. In a letter to congressional leaders that renewed Bush's veto threat, administration officials said that through November, only $6 billion of the $40 billion has been spent. They said the Democratic proposal for $8 billion more than Bush proposed in emergency aid to New York and other places the terrorists hit was not necessary because recovery costs remain unknown. They said the Democrats' $237 million plan for local law enforcement aid "will have little or no tangible impact on preventing or responding to terrorism." In Thursday's two test votes, Feingold was the only senator to cross party lines. The GOP-led House approved a $20 billion package last week. tom watson tosiwmee