Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (208075)	12/7/2001 5:11:27 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

I was merely referring to your rhetorical flourish about conceding it all the rights and privileges of a citizen. But now that you mention it, the reasons for abortions are sometimes trivial. For example, it has been documented that people have used it for sex selection, although the percentage is uncertain......

To: TigerPaw who wrote (208075)	12/7/2001 5:25:14 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"the procedure would not have been considered if it were not likely to wreck the mother's family and future and perhaps many more people's either" Bull Crap. As I have stated, I know a number of woman who have aborted. I do not know any where it would have wrecked anyone's life. They all wrecked the life of the one who could not defend himself though. "The assumption that the pregnancy, birth, and later disposition of the child is going to be A-ok is unfounded" You make a lot of assumptions for others. Your assumption (that you have stated many times) that they will end in misery is far less accurate, and much more negative.