Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (208147)	12/8/2001 11:46:33 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

buddy more crock, The number of detained has been reported and if you learned to read I said it was reported on drudge or newsmax. Is it you are so ignorant or you use drudge to minimize or imply something unreliable. All just more dishonesty??? As to public or private, you have you head up you butt in ignorance. Learn about those detained as material witnesses. And those arrested on federal charges, I don't know exactly what the rules are. But I know no laws are being broken. The restriction of the FBI in the gun records shows that the law is being followed. You wish to whine and assume someone else is breaking the law. That's nice. You whine and create noise and distract effort and energy from finding those who would kill other Americans. Well it's your right. Adults are in charge. Honest and honorable men are in charge. Nothing other than false assertions have been made to the contrary. tom watson tosiwmee

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (208147)	12/8/2001 1:12:34 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

"2) detained (for immigration violations) means you are very much on the hook to the Gov" Why do you feel illegal immigrants should not be detained? Do other countries allow immigrants to live there illegally? "A) How many detained/held?" Ascroft has answered that VERY SPECIFICALLY. What is your point? "B) How many charged, and with what? He has answered the how many VERY SPECIFICALLY. Again, there is no constitutional "civil right" that the gov't MUST release the names and the crimes. It is up to the person detained. We are protecting THEIR PRIVACY. If you were being held you could announce what you are being held for if you wanted. You seem to be saying the government MUST MAKE THIS PUBLIC. Are you sure that is the best way to protect civil rights? I think it is kind of cool that it is UP TO THE PERSON DETAINED. You obviously think differently, but I would love to hear your justification for this MANDATORY PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT of your crime and your circumstances.