SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (8588)12/8/2001 11:04:12 AM
From: briskit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
Your point is that nothing can be known of god? God is unknowable, if there is one, but there is no way to even know if there is one, or if we know anything or not. Is your point about knowledge and how we know things? Or do you think anything can be "known" at all? What would it matter to you if you could or did know?
Addendum: If this sounds argumentative, it is not. I hope to stay completely disinterested in arguments and arguing. If I do not manage it, remind me please, because I have more fun ways of wasting my time. Thanks.



To: epicure who wrote (8588)12/8/2001 10:25:26 PM
From: s.jennings  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 28931
 
"What do we know at all about God?"
What do we know at all about ourselves?
The problem isn't God and the problem isn't ourselves. The problem is the conflict between the two. This conflict won't be resolved until we begin to understand both. The belief in the existence of self and non-existence of God is just as imbalanced as the belief in the existence of God and the non-existence of the self.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News