SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (140901)12/8/2001 9:05:14 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586564
 
In all the systems we sold since these events, we have purchased NOT ONE WD drive. I'm sure others had similar experiences.

AMD once had a worse reputation in its sector.....a sector that's a lot more visible. Not saying that WDC and AMD are the same situation but I remember I heard the same kind of comments re AMD chips that you are making about WDC's hard drives.

Like AMD, WDC has been coming out with new product lines, consolidating its operations and product diversity, improving manufacturing standards and reducing operating costs. Unlike AMD, it has a fairly new mgmt team [new in the past two years] who are committed to the WDC turnaround....and are showing it by having bought shares....75k for the CFO, 20k for the CEO. Can't say that WDC's there yet but at $4 [now $5] per share, I am willing to take a chance. I too had written WDC off two years ago...so it was with surprise when I read that things were changing....and I thought I would give you guys the heads up in case you missed it. We'll see how it works out.

ted



To: i-node who wrote (140901)12/12/2001 12:10:02 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1586564
 
I avoid WDs for a different reason. They have trailed technologically for a long time. Seek times, throughput, and CPU utilization are were I made my decisions.

It is interesting to hear your input on reliability.

Thanks, Peter