Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Football Forum (NFL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (10191)	12/10/2001 10:59:36 AM
From: Augustus Gloop	Respond to of 45640

They wont. They'll lose at least 2 more games.

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (10191)	12/10/2001 12:25:22 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 45640

Did you watch the Seabag game last night? I couldn't believe my eyes. Holmgren deserves to lose his job. Alexander has been nothing less than a stud while Watters was out with an injury. As with most backs it takes a number of carries to get into a rhythm. Although Denver played a decent game it seemed to me that Holmgren never allowed Alexander to hit that groove. Instead he platoons Watters with Alexander taking away the carries from the very person responsible for the many wins they had achieved over the past 8 weeks. This also hurt Hasselbeck who needs a running game to support him at this point in his career. The future of this franchise is not Ricky Watters it's Alexander. Because of that and they way he played in Watters absence Holmgren should have played him the whole game. You never know when your feature back is going to pop one but you do know he can't do it on the bench. Shaun Alexander may be the 2nd best back in football (right now) only behind Faulk. For Holmgren to platoon him after the numbers he's achieved is nuts and it also screws the continuity that the offense had going over the past several weeks. .