SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mark Fowler who wrote (9982)12/10/2001 10:31:25 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 57684
 
Briefing/Stock Brief: Sector Performance: Encouraging Signs

10-Dec-01 10:47 ET

[BRIEFING.COM - Robert V. Green] Exactly thirteen weeks ago, it was Monday, September 10. No one knew how the world would change on the next day. Since then, the market has struggled to find the proper place as an outlook for the future. Now, however, it seems clear: the market has bottomed. The Nasdaq, the S&P500, and the Dow have tested lows, and rebounded. This is encouraging, but an analysis of recent sector performance is even more encouraging.

The Overall Market Performance
Every major market index was headed down during the summer of 2001. It is somewhat remarkable that the bottom of the market was reached only 10 days after the Attack on America, and only about 11% lower than the overall market on September 10. In hindsight, it is fair to say that the Attack on America did not have a major impact on the markets. Some of the 11% decline post-Attack would likely have happened anyway. It may be reasonable to say that the Attack on America only affected the markets by about a 5% decline, which was quickly recouped.

Measuring the performance of the market from just before the Attack the America allows us to view how the market has processed all of the information since September 11: the terrorist threat, the declaration of recession, the elimination of 30 year bonds, and every economic indicator over the last three months.

The table below measures the market performance from the close on September 7 and November 9 to the close on December 7.
Index 4 week percentage change 13 week percentage change
Dow 4.6% 4.6%
S&P 500 3.4% 6.7%
Nasdaq 10.5% 19.8%

The Dow had regained, almost exactly, its September 7 position on November 7. The other indexes have made half of the gains since September 7 in the last four weeks.

What these returns indicate is fairly clear: the market does not feel that the outlook view today is that much worse than the outlook on September 10, the day before the Attack on America.

Sector Performance
The recent performance of various sectors also tells an interesting story. The table below shows the performance of major sectors of the market.
Sector 4 week returns 13 week returns
Technology 12.9 30.5
Transportation 10.1 3.6
Consumer Cyclical 9.8 2.7
Basic Material 7.7 5.5
Service 7.1 13.7
Capital Goods 6.2 2.9
Financials 3.4 6.0
Healthcare 2.7 5.6
Consumer Non-Cyclical -0.2 -0.6
Utilities -2.4 -6.1
Energy -4.2 -5.9

The technology sector receives a lot of media attention, because it has been the leader of the market for much of the past decade. Clearly, optimism about rebounds in the technology sector is strong.

However, the interesting story of these returns are in the other sectors.

Reading The Tea Leaves
When the four week return is higher than a 13 week return it means that investor faith has recently strengthened in that sector. There are four sectors in that category.

Consumer cyclicals, basic materials, and capital goods are all sectors that are hit hard in recessions. With strong returns over the past 4 weeks, there is only one conclusion: the market believes that the risk to these stocks has lessened. The only plausible explanation is that the market feels the recession is already over.

The transportation sector is also a recession impacted industry, however, this sector may also be driven by events in Afghanistan. If it terrorist strength is weakening, the threat to airlines may be lessened. (Dow theory has always pointed to the transportation sector as a leading indicator of the economy, on the idea that transportation of basic materials to factories is a sign of increasing demand. Dow theory may be less applicable in today's economy, however, than it used to be.)

The poor returns of consumer non-cyclicals, utilities, and energy point to another core belief: low to little inflation. The returns in each of these sectors are strongly affected by pricing pressures and inflation. All three of these sectors are things that everyone must buy, even in recessions. In periods of inflation, the stocks have some degree of pricing protection, which allows them to protect their revenue and margins. As such, they perform more strongly in inflationary periods. The weakness in these stocks indicates the market believes economic growth will not be overshadowed by inflationary pressures.

When you put all of these interpretations together, you get a picture with three combined themes:

* The end of the recession, meaning a return to strong economic growth
* Continued low inflation, or even lower inflation, will persist
* Lower risk of terrorist activities
* Stronger faith in technological advances

This is an extremely positive combination of themes.

Clearly, in recent weeks, the movement of the major market indexes has been encouraging. But it is also encouraging to see that the picture painted by sector returns is one of a growth economy, with low inflation, and technological innovation. Those factors have been the driver of the economy, and the market for the last 15 years.

Reading the sectors movements provide a view of what the "market" is anticipating for the future. Whether the market is anticipating correctly, or is simply longing hopefully for the great market drivers of the past, remains to be seen, of course.

Nevertheless, with all caveats in mind, the recent market and sector performance can only be interpreted as an encouraging indicator for the future.

Comments may be emailed to the author, Robert V. Green, at rvgreen@briefing.com
<http://www.briefing.com/images/Briefing/bullet_top3.gif> Back to Top
Copyright © 2001 Briefing.com, Inc. All rights reserved.

Used with permission of briefing.com



To: Mark Fowler who wrote (9982)12/13/2001 9:48:46 AM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57684
 
08:07 ET Superconductor Tech. (SCON) 4.89: Receives a follow-on purchase agreement for a minimum of 1,000 units of its SuperFilter System from a major N. American wireless carrier. Deliveries are scheduled to begin immediately and continue through the Q1 of 2003. Financial terms of the agreement were not disclosed.



To: Mark Fowler who wrote (9982)12/13/2001 4:19:07 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57684
 
Windows XP: What is the Verdict from Businesses?

Thursday December 13 01:12 PM EST

By Robyn Weisman, www.NewsFactor.com

The advertisements for Microsoft's (Nasdaq: MSFT - news) latest operating system, Windows XP (news - web sites), appear to be focused almost exclusively on the consumer. As Madonna (news - web sites)'s "Ray of Light" pulses, a person flies through a Technicolor blue sky holding a Windows laptop, while below people edit movies and do all sorts of multimedia things. It is as if they had walked into a Mac ad by mistake.

While the consumer push seems to have a Steve Jobs (news - web sites) ring to it, businesses, which almost without exception have used XP's predecessors, are not necessarily looking for the latest innovations in digital content. They just want an OS that is stable and runs their software without fanfare and cost effectively.

Given these rather modest yet unbending requirements, are businesses switching over to Windows XP in droves or are they taking a pass -- at least, for now?

'Good Enough' Computing

IDC analyst Alan Promisel told NewsFactor Network that XP's snazzy new look, ease of use and more intuitive setup do not have the same resonance for businesses as for consumers, especially when so many businesses have cut IT spending in the wake of a soft economy.

As a result, said Promisel, enterprises so far have had a cool to lukewarm reaction to Microsoft's latest OS, and are sticking with Windows 98 (news - web sites) and 2000.

"The general crunch on IT spending [causes Windows XP] not to be on the forefront of IT buyers' and IT managers' buying lists," Promisel told NewsFactor, adding that older Windows operating systems offer "good enough" computing for most businesses.

Lack of Need

Promisel went on to say that a lack of need combined with the weak economy have conspired to make Windows XP a bust with mid-sized and large businesses -- at least, for the near term.

Laura DiDio, director of desktop and server operating systems for Giga Information Group, who has covered Microsoft since 1986, told NewsFactor that when businesses ask her whether they should install Windows 2000 (news - web sites) or Windows XP, she tells them that 90 percent of both systems' code is the same.

Only the remaining 10 percent reflects XP's improvements in graphics and applications.

In addition, recent tests performed by InfoWorld indicate that XP is actually slower than Windows 2000 Professional in core business applications.

"If you're a business that needs video capabilities, XP is the way to go," DiDio said. "But when you're talking rank and file office workers," there really isn't any compelling need to upgrade -- until 2003.

2003: The XP Breaking Point

XP "does appear to do a very good job at seamless integration," and its wireless LAN and video capabilities absolutely will cause businesses to upgrade beginning in late 2002 or early 2003, IDC analyst Promisel said.

But DiDio found a more compelling reason for companies to upgrade to XP from their present Windows OS.

"Microsoft support for Windows 2000 ends in early 2003, whereas Microsoft will provide support for XP through 2005," said DiDio, adding that this may serve as the break point for most businesses, rather than the need to adopt advanced features.

Starting around the second quarter of 2002, Windows XP "is going to take off, and you'll start to see rapid adoption" in the business sector, according to DiDio.
_________________________