SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wanna_bmw who wrote (152015)12/11/2001 2:11:40 AM
From: Joe NYC  Respond to of 186894
 
wbmw,

Good to see that you can be objective. As far as upgrades are concerned, I agree, that it is far from ideal solution, as memory types and speeds, FSB, chipsets improve, on the system-wide level, hard drives and graphics cards improve. But even though it is not ideal, CPU upgrade is generally cheap and painless, unlike broader upgrade, or even change to a new system.

Joe



To: wanna_bmw who wrote (152015)12/11/2001 11:19:38 AM
From: fingolfen  Respond to of 186894
 
On the other hand, when Intel has their act together, it only makes sense to accommodate the largest possible market, which includes those that want a guaranteed upgrade path. Of course, guaranteeing an upgrade path isn't easy; like I've been saying, there is more to the upgrade path than just the socket. AMD and Intel will both face challenges in providing this ability, but when it comes between innovation and legacy support, I believe Intel will (rightfully) go with the innovative approach. Socket-478 has many advantages over Intel's previous sockets, and I would certainly take it over shoe-horning future CPUs into the bulky and inelegant socket-423 design.

I have to agree here. The socket 478 seems to be a top notch design, and I really don't expect Intel to change the socket until they have a new core to drop into the socket (which may only be a year or so, but that will get us to a 3.0GHz P4).