Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frederick Smart who wrote (8667)	12/11/2001 9:45:24 AM
From: Bill Fischofer	Respond to of 28931

I largely agree, though I won't get too worked up by those who don't. I try to remind myself that I have no "need" to be "right". <g> You use the word "claim" in a technical sense which does not conform to its usual meanings. Would you agree? See dictionary.com* for its standard meanings. Many people regard the Bible as divinely inspired. Many do not. Among "believers" there are those who take the Bible at "face value" and those who see layers of esoteric import. My personal view is that God did not give us reason as an impediment to knowing Him. He may be subtle, but not devious, and the "Book of Life" is as good a source text as any.