SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (152037)12/11/2001 10:35:46 AM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 186894
 
"I don't think that Jerry wouldn't have beaten Intel's eleventh-hour bid to Microsoft unless it came down to selling below cost."

Not necessarily. At the time of that last minute action by Intel, the Duron had not been released. In fact, the first semi-official verification of Duron specifications were via the Microsoft slides on the processor. So even if the price was a little over breakeven, Jerry likely would have dropped out because of the feeling that they could actually sell them for more money. If the market hadn't fallen off a cliff in late 2000, he would have been right, also.

In addition, all Intel needs to get is more than packaging and testing costs to make it a win. They should have plenty of die that can't be sold to anyone else. All indications is that they had some serious binsplit issues with the PIII and XBox was their only outlet for those chips...



To: SilentZ who wrote (152037)12/11/2001 1:08:49 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Z - Re: "If you're wondering where I base my assumption that Intel may be losing money on the chips for the XBox, it comes from three points (which I've scattered on this thread thus far):"

Good.

You have assumed what you want to asssume to support your OPINION that Intel is losing money on XBOX chips.

Now what does that prove?