SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GVTucker who wrote (152096)12/11/2001 5:13:26 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Should the FEDS swarm down on Intel and arrest everybody?

Heck, yeah, if they start posting this information on a public bulletin board.


If Craig Barrett or Andy Grove posted information here it wouldn't be insider information anymore. It would be public.

EP



To: GVTucker who wrote (152096)12/11/2001 6:13:56 PM
From: Windsock  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
GV - Re:"Heck, yeah, if they start posting this information on a public bulletin board."

You are off the mark here. Intel executives give inside information with every financial report and at every conference call and analyst meeting.

There is nothing illegal about that.

There are many people that can give a good estimate for the Intel manufacturing cost for a particular processor -- and some of them even work at AMD.



To: GVTucker who wrote (152096)12/11/2001 7:07:27 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 186894
 
GV - Re: "There is nothing illegal about having inside information. You, however, are posting a conclusion on a public bulletin board. If that conclusion is based upon inside information, you have misappropriated that information."

Nope.

You're now doing the AMD bait and switch technique - when you're wrong about one claim, switch to another and ignore the first.

Paul