Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (152243)	12/12/2001 1:16:41 PM
From: wanna_bmw	Respond to of 186894

Combjelly, Re: "I did not make the claim that there were no chips that binned out above 866MHz as you tried to claim." I see that since you are unwilling to admit your mistakes, you are now throwing around blame to those trying to catch you in the act. In actuality, I am claiming that your previous assumption suggests very low volumes of high frequency parts. It is a fact that chips binning "at around 866MHz or lower" will not clock very often at 1.1GHz. However, Intel seems to have a healthy supply of such chips. pricewatch.com Even if you admitted to Elmer that you might have been incorrect about the 866MHz binning frequency, you still haven't answered my question about how much the 1.1GHz coppermine availability has changed your original assumption. Instead, you are accusing me of misrepresenting your claims. That's a classic AMDroid dodging tactic, and one that certainly won't win you the argument. wbmw

To: combjelly who wrote (152243)	12/12/2001 1:42:56 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 186894

I did not make the claim that there were no chips that binned out above 866MHz as you tried to claim. No you didn't make that claim but you did leave a problem unaddressed. If Intel's main binsplit is or was at 866MHz and below we have a real problem explaining how Intel has shipped the volumes they have at 900MHz and above. Your theory would do much better explaining how AMD ships only 7.7 Million processors from 2 large fabs but you applied this theory to the company who ships over 30 million. Good theory, wrong company. EP