Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (9818)	12/12/2001 1:45:22 PM
From: goldsnow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23908

How about we counter your flimsy Jewish perspective with a detailed flimsy Palestinian perspective: What about it? We? Who are we? You are an Arab?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (9818)	12/12/2001 1:49:28 PM
From: goldsnow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 23908

your flimsy Jewish perspective >>>> The article that I cited was very comprehensive, contained numerous perspectives, Arab, non-Arab...You did not read it, right? And it actually cited all original quotes...like "This maximalist definition of the aims of Zionism once again raised a question: Did the Arabs of Palestine constitute a distinct national entity and, if so, what should be the Zionist attitude toward them and what should be their status within the projected Jewish state? Jabotinsky's answer is contained in two highly important articles he published in 1923 under the heading "The Iron Wall." They gave the essence of Revisionist theory on the Arab question and provided its fighting slogan. The first article is entitled "On the Iron War (We and the Arabs)." It begins on a personal note in which Jabotinsky engagingly described his emotional attitude to the Arabs as one of "polite indifference." But he went on to reject, as totally unacceptable, any thought of removing the Arabs from Palestine. The real question, he said, switching to a philosophical mode, was whether one could always achieve peaceful aims by peaceful means. The answer to this question, he insisted, depended without a doubt on the attitude of the "