Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: im a survivor who wrote (9642)	12/12/2001 4:36:43 PM
From: 100cfm	Respond to of 10934

You're all wrong. It was the Wedbush-Morgan upgrade!<gg> 100 PS: To Jake, DownSouth bashing here will draw more missiles then an Afgahny SAM site. If it wasn't for Jerry most here on this thread still wouldn't even know what NAS meant. Besides to my knowledge Jerry wasn't wrong about anything since he never prophesized anything, especially the stock price. All he did was try to keep us Non-Techies informed on what was going on technology wise with Ntap and the competition.

To: im a survivor who wrote (9642)	12/12/2001 5:30:40 PM
From: SecularBull	Respond to of 10934

If it's such a steal at $20, why not at $23.5? You'll be able to buy back <$20, and then some, imho (and not post-split, either). It just sucks to have missed the additional run beyond what I thought was a high price. Nevertheless, I would not have ever been inclined to hold it up to this level from where it has been. Just as single digits was ridiculously low, the converse of low $20s is ridiculously high considering where it has been (not to mention the macroeconomic picture). My goal is to lever-up my holdings near-term for the long term. To do that, I have to sell what I think is high, and buy when I think it is low. ~SB~