SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (1452)12/12/2001 4:47:03 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15516
 
Background:The Ashcroft Controversies
A Look at the Key Issues Surrounding George W. Bush's Attorney General-Designate

President-elect George W. Bush's nominee for attorney general, former Sen. John Ashcroft of Missouri faces a tough confirmation hearing before the Senate this week.

And while Senate Republicans are predicting their one-time colleague will be confirmed, the hearings promise to become rancorous. In a career in public life during which he also served as both attorney general and governor of Missouri, Ashcroft has been involved in a number of controversial matters — enough so that a 200-member coalition of Democratic-leaning interest groups announced their opposition to his appointment last Tuesday.
Here is an overview of important issues that have become the center of attention as Ashcroft's hearings are set to begin.

Judgeships

Ronnie White's isn't the only nomination for a federal judgeship that experienced controversy involving Ashcroft, who waged well-publicized battles against other White House nominees.

In June 1995, a Jefferson City attorney who once sharply questioned Ashcroft, then state attorney general, in a court-ordered deposition went public with assertions that Ashcroft was nursing a decade-old grudge by opposing his nomination to the federal bench.

Attorney Alex Bartlett was among six candidates chosen by an independent commission in 1993 for President Clinton to consider for two court vacancies in Missouri.

Bartlett said he was told by Clinton administration officials that Ashcroft was raising questions that centered on the old lawsuit. The case, which Ashcroft brought as Missouri's attorney general, charged Inland Oil with consumer fraud over a gasoline additive. Bartlett was one of the attorneys for Inland Oil.

Bartlett said the problem revolved around a deposition taken of Ashcroft and other officials in the state attorney general's office in 1983, he said. Ashcroft objected to the deposition, but a court ordered that it be taken. At the deposition, Bartlett said Ashcroft declined to answer some questions and would not produce some documents related to the case. As those issues were being hashed out, the case was settled.

An Ashcroft spokesman declined at the time to comment directly on Bartlett's allegations, but said Ashcroft was demanding that nominees "possess the highest standards of character and ethics."

Noting that the Inland incident happened a decade before his nomination, Bartlett said: "It may burn some bridges, but I just felt something needed to be said."

Concealed Guns

Ashcroft is a supporter of allowing people to carry concealed guns. In 1999, Ashcroft lent his voice to radio ads endorsing an unsuccessful referendum that would have let Missourians apply to county sheriffs for permits to carry concealed guns. The campaign was heavily backed by the National Rifle Association.

Opposition to the initiative was funded largely by Handgun Control Inc., a lobby group founded by President Reagan's former press secretary Jim Brady and his wife, Sarah.

During last year's election, gun-control advocates ran televisions ads against Ashcroft featuring the Bradys. However, Ashcroft's stance on concealed guns has changed over time. As governor, Ashcroft expressed "grave concerns" in 1992 about then-pending state legislation allowing Missourians to pack hidden handguns.

Abortion Rights

Ashcroft has said he is opposed to abortion in all cases except those which would endanger the life of the mother. He is opposed to abortion in cases of incest or rape.

Abortion-rights proponents say Ashcroft would work to limit or overturn a woman's right to choose.

"John Ashcroft … will roll back decades of legal advances and public policy gains for women and their families," the National Women's Law Center said in a statement released Tuesday.

Also at issue, say groups opposed to the nomination, is the willingness of Ashcroft and those working under him at the Justice Department to prosecute people accused of violent crimes against doctors performing or providing access to abortions.

Bob Jones University

In May, 1999, Ashcroft traveled to Bob Jones University in South Carolina to receive an honorary degree.

The Christian school in Greenville, S.C., has a segregationist history and until recently banned interracial dating and marriage. It lost its tax-exempt status in the 1970s because of racial discrimination but was a popular stop for many GOP candidates seeking conservative support.

Ashcroft said despite accepting an honorary degree from Bob Jones University, he rejected the college's anti-Catholic beliefs and its policy against interracial dating. He said he didn't have prior knowledge that the school held those positions.

While Democrats said Ashcroft used poor judgment in speaking at the school, they stopped short of accusing the senator of being a bigot. He has come under criticism from liberal organizations who say his conservative ideology might interfere with the attorney general's duties to enforce civil rights and other federal programs.

The Confederacy

In the October 1998 edition of Southern Partisan, a South Carolina magazine, Ashcroft said "traditionalists must do more" to defend Confederate President Jefferson Davis and Gens. Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee.

An Ashcroft spokesman defended the remarks, noting that Lee, for example, should not be disrespected as an American despite his leading role in the Confederate cause.

The Missouri Citizen Education Fund, a coalition of several St. Louis-area groups, circulated a petition calling for Ashcroft to publicly retract his magazine-interview praise for the Confederate leaders. The group accused Ashcroft of pandering to racist elements in society.

To discount the racism accusations, Republicans forwarded a copy of a 1991 letter from the Mound City Bar Association, a black lawyers group, that praised Ashcroft's decision as Missouri governor to appoint a black woman to a state judgeship.

Voting Rights

As governor of Missouri, Ashcroft twice vetoed legislation intended to allow the League of Women Voters to register new voters in St. Louis, a Democratic-leaning city.

The bills would have implemented the same voter-registration procedures already used in the more heavily Republican areas of the St. Louis suburbs.

Ashcroft cited concerns over voter fraud as his rationale for nixing the legislation. But observers claimed that was not the case.

"There is no evidence that the fraud feared by the Election Board would take place if outside groups were permitted to sign up voters," the St. Louis Post-Dispatch said in a July 1989 editorial. "Accordingly, the bill ought to become law."

Transportation

A 1993 book published by Ashcroft's office at the end of his two terms as governor praised passage of a highway program as one of his top accomplishments. But the plan is now considered a financial flop.

Ashcroft's book says of the plan, in part: "In February 1992, after leading an extensive legislative campaign, Governor Ashcroft signed into law legislation hailed as the most important economic development bill of the decade."

The 1992 plan was embraced by the Republican governor and a bipartisan majority of lawmakers. It boosted the state gasoline tax by 6 cents on the dollar and made some big promises: building four-lane highways to all Missouri cities with 5,000 or more residents; creation of 40,000 new jobs; and "roads twice as safe for travel."

But the then-state auditor of Ashcroft's own political party, along with independent analysts, have declared the 1992 plan a financial failure as a blueprint for road building. They concluded that the plan started out with $1.3 billion more in projects than money, and that the plan's projections didn't account for inflation or growth in the scope of projects.

Ashcroft sidestepped responsibility, saying he relied on state transportation officials — part of his administration — to crunch the numbers and make them work. Any problems with the math came in the planning stage, he said, not from his office.

All this has left the Legislature and state officials struggling for ways to win voter approval of increased revenues for road building.



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (1452)12/12/2001 6:15:51 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 

"There's a difference between a culture that has no king but Caesar, no standard but the civil authority,
and a culture that has no king but Jesus, no standard but the eternal authority.
When you have no king but Caesar, you release Barabas — criminality, destruction,
thievery, the lowest and the least. When you have no king but Jesus, you release the eternal,
you release the highest and the best. "
---ASHCROFT

People worship many gods. And there are many people who do NOT believe in God at all.
Yet, the US managed very well until Bush and Ashcroft came along.--Mephisto



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (1452)12/14/2001 2:40:37 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
The Last Job Ashcroft Should Be Given Is A.G.

By ROBERT SCHEER
Tuesday, January 16, 2001
Los Angeles Times

That John Ashcroft is a right-wing, pro-gun religious fanatic who laments the civil rights gains of the past decades and believes that leaders of the pro-slavery Southern Confederacy are deserving of veneration should not disqualify him from holding an important office. No, indeed, he would make an excellent president of the National Rifle Assn., or leader of
the Christian Coalition or an anti-abortion group. Perhaps there's even a job for the defeated Republican senator in the federal government, say on some historical commission devoted to the restoration of Civil War artifacts, such as the holding cells for runaway slaves.


But how can George W. Bush appoint as U.S. attorney general a man who gave an interview to the pro-Confederate Southern Partisan magazine that praised the magazine for its "heritage . . . of defending Southern patriots like Lee, Jackson and Davis"?

Ashcroft said it was necessary to stand up for the leaders of the Old South "or else we'll be taught that these people were giving their lives, subscribing their sacred fortunes and their honor to some PERVERTED AGENDA.." Never mind that the agenda these people were defending was slavery. This can only lead one to believe that Ashcroft's strenuous opposition to affirmative action is based on the view that slavery and segregation were not all that damaging to the lives of black Americans.

Ashcroft represents the extreme flash point of the culture wars that are threatening to tear this country apart. He's of the school that interprets Christianity as a mandate for condemnation and exclusion rather than tolerance and inclusion. He's so imbued with his own personal connection to the Almighty that he interprets his electoral defeats as "crucifixions" and his return to public life as "resurrections."

His religious arrogance allows for no other interpretation of God's will. For example, Ashcroft has made support of the death penalty a litmus test in his selection of judges; what about the Roman Catholic Church's position condemning capital punishment? Ashcroft finds a biblical basis for his stern condemnation of homosexuality, but there are leading Christian and Jewish denominations that strongly disagree.

Ashcroft has every right to practice his variant of Pentecostal Christianity, but the idea that the nation's chief law enforcer might force his interpretation into the law of the land is deeply troubling.
The attorney general is charged with protecting the civil rights of minorities and women's reproductive freedom.

Yet Ashcroft's view of what rights are protected by the Constitution is so narrowly defined as to condone the reversal of most of the advances in human rights in the past half-century.

For example, at a time of rising hate crimes aimed at homosexuals, he voted against the Hate Crimes Prevention Act as well as bills banning discrimination in employment. He evenvoted against AIDS funding.
On a woman's right to choose, which is accepted by a clear majority of Americans and by the courts, Ashcroft has endorsed the most extreme side of the anti-abortion position:

"If I had the opportunity to pass but a single law," he has said, it would be a constitutional amendment to "ban every abortion except for those medically necessary to save the life of the mother." He excludes rape and incest as justification for abortion.

Ashcroft's abortion views are so extreme that he would favor banning some contraceptives, such as the pill and IUDs,
which can prevent a fertilized egg from being implanted in the uterus, thus causing, in his view, de facto abortions. As attorney general, he would play a crucial role in picking federal judges, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and there is no way that he would be party to nominating judges who accept the court's decision in Roe vs. Wade.

Finally, we don't need an attorney general who's been the NRA's most reliable vote in the Senate and the recipient of much funding from that organization. He was one of only 20 senators who opposed mandatory safety locks for guns. He also opposed a ban on assault weapons, and he urged Missouri voters to legalize the carrying of concealed weapons.


The last job in the world that Ashcroft should be offered is that of U.S. attorney general.

Imagine the outcry if Bush had appointed Jesse Helms to that position. Yet according to the National Journal, Ashcroft's voting record as a senator was to the right of Helms. Bush has betrayed the vast majority of Americans who voted for the politics of inclusiveness and moderation advanced by both him and Al Gore. Why is there not a single Republican senator, let alone more Democrats, who are willing to condemn this obvious disaster of a nomination?
- - -

Robert Scheer Is a Times Contributing Editor

latimes.com



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (1452)12/14/2001 2:45:41 AM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15516
 
Ashcroft came under fire for accepting an honorary degree and giving the
commencement speech at Bob Jones University, which until recently opposed
interracial marriages and dating. He said he was unaware of the university's
views when he gave the speech but declined to return the degree.


Above excerpt from:DEMOCRATS READY TO TROT OUT ASHCROFT'S CONSERVATIVE VIEWS

chicagotribune.com.

By John Solomon
Associated Press

December 28, 2000


For full story see:http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=16790691

*******************************************************************************************************************************

Dear Karen,

Ashcroft supporters brag about his degree from Yale. Because of Ashcroft's education, only the
most naive person would believe that Ashcroft was unaware of the views at Bob Jones University.
By the way, I believe George Jr. made an appearance at Bob Jones as well.